Literature DB >> 17588224

Appetitive nature of drug cues re-confirmed with physiological measures and the potential role of stage of change.

Jared P Dempsey1, Lee M Cohen, Valerie L Hobson, Patrick K Randall.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Smokers report pleasant reactions to viewing cigarettes, suggesting that smoking cues may be appetitive in nature. Two studies have investigated this hypothesis through physiological assessment. The first study found that smoking cues were physiologically appetitive in nature, with dampened startle response to smoking pictures in comparison to neutral pictures. The second found that smoking pictures did not modulate the startle response, suggesting such cues may not be physiologically appetitive.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to further investigate how participants' motivation to quit smoking might modulate responses to smoking cues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two nicotine-dependent smokers viewed standardized pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and smoking pictures. Eleven of the subjects reported no intent to quit (precontemplators) and 11 reported planning to quit within the next 6 months (contemplators). Acoustic startle probes were randomly administered while subjects viewed the pictures, and eyeblink startle magnitude was measured with electromyography (EMG).
RESULTS: As a whole, participants exhibited dampened startle responses during smoking pictures, relative to unpleasant pictures. Precontemplators showed robust startle inhibition to smoking pictures, in comparison to both neutral and unpleasant pictures. Contemplators, however, showed blunted unpleasant picture augmentation and a lack of startle inhibition for pleasant pictures.
CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with the idea that smoking pictures are appetitive in nature. Furthermore, they suggest that smokers at a later stage of change may exhibit a lesser response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588224     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0839-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Appetitve effects of drug cues modelled by pictures of the intake ritual: generality of cue-modulated startle examined with inpatient alcoholics.

Authors:  R F Mucha; A Geier; M Stuhlinger; G Mundle
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change.

Authors:  C C DiClemente; J O Prochaska; S K Fairhurst; W F Velicer; M M Velasquez; J S Rossi
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1991-04

4.  Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?

Authors:  J T Larsen; A P McGraw; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-10

5.  Distribution of smokers by stage in three representative samples.

Authors:  W F Velicer; J L Fava; J O Prochaska; D B Abrams; K M Emmons; J P Pierce
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

7.  Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status.

Authors:  W F Velicer; C C DiClemente; J O Prochaska; N Brandenburg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-05

8.  Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment.

Authors:  K O Fagerström
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Appetitive nature of drug cues confirmed with physiological measures in a model using pictures of smoking.

Authors:  A Geier; R F Mucha; P Pauli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Affective modulation of the startle response in depression: influence of the severity of depression, anhedonia, and anxiety.

Authors:  H Kaviani; J A Gray; S A Checkley; P W Raven; G D Wilson; V Kumari
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Cue Reactivity: Non-Drug-Related Motivationally Relevant Stimuli Are Necessary to Understand Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Charles E Green; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Maher A Karam-Hage; David W Wetter; Susan M Schembre; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  The effects of nicotine dose expectancy and motivationally relevant distracters on vigilance.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Francesco Versace; Andrew J Waters; David G Gilbert; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-19

3.  Cigarette cues capture attention of smokers and never-smokers, but for different reasons.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Maurizio Codispoti; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Pharmacological intervention and abstinence in smokers undergoing cessation treatment: A psychophysiological study.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Jonathan Xian; Jennifer A Minnix; Cho Y Lam; Maher Karam-Hage; Paul M Cinciripini; Jason D Robinson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Motivation to quit smoking and startle modulation in female smokers: context specificity of smoking cue reactivity.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Muñoz; Sofía Idrissi; María Blasa Sánchez-Barrera; Ma Carmen Fernández; Jaime Vila
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Smoking stimuli from the terminal phase of cigarette consumption may not be cues for smoking in healthy smokers.

Authors:  Ronald F Mucha; Paul Pauli; Markus Weber; Markus Winkler
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Evaluation of the Alcohol Craving Questionnaire-Now factor structures: application of a cue reactivity paradigm.

Authors:  Kevin M Connolly; Scott F Coffey; Joseph S Baschnagel; David J Drobes; Michael E Saladin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Visual Attention to Antismoking PSAs: Smoking Cues Versus Other Attention-Grabbing Features.

Authors:  Ashley N Sanders-Jackson; Joseph N Cappella; Deborah L Linebarger; Jessica Taylor Piotrowski; Moira O'Keeffe; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Conditioned cortical reactivity to cues predicting cigarette-related or pleasant images.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Differential cigarette-related startle cue reactivity among light, moderate, and heavy smokers.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Maher Karam-Hage; John A Dani; Thomas R Kosten; David W Wetter; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.