Literature DB >> 17588204

Breast cancer: a candidate gene approach across the estrogen metabolic pathway.

Christina Justenhoven1, Ute Hamann, Falk Schubert, Marc Zapatka, Christiane B Pierl, Sylvia Rabstein, Silvia Selinski, Tina Mueller, Katja Ickstadt, Michael Gilbert, Yon-Dschun Ko, Christian Baisch, Beate Pesch, Volker Harth, Hermann M Bolt, Caren Vollmert, Thomas Illig, Roland Eils, Jürgen Dippon, Hiltrud Brauch.   

Abstract

Polymorphisms within the estrogen metabolic pathway are prime candidates for a possible association with breast cancer risk. We investigated 11 genes encoding key proteins of this pathway for their potential contribution to breast cancer risk. Of these CYP17A1, CYP19A1, EPHX1, HSD17B1, SRD5A2, and PPARG2 participate in biosynthesis, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, COMT, GSTP1, and SOD2 in catabolism and detoxification. We performed a population-based case-control study with 688 incident breast cancer cases and 724 controls from Germany and genotyped 18 polymorphisms by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), PCR based RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), and TaqMan allelic discrimination. Genotype frequencies were compared between cases and controls and odds ratios were calculated by conditional logistic regression. Further statistical analyses were based on cluster analysis, multifactor dimensionality reduction, logic regression, and global testing. Single factor analyses pointed to CYP1B1_1294_GG as a possible breast cancer risk modulator (OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.34-4.93) and two way stratification suggested associations between BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2) and COMT_472_GG (P = 0.0076 and P = 0.0026), BMI < 20 kg/m(2) and HSD17B1_937_GG (P = 0.0082) as well as CYP17A1_-34_CC and HRT use > or =10 years (P = 0.0063). Following correction for multiple testing none of these associations remained significant. No significant association between breast cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms was observed in multifactor analyses. The tested polymorphisms of the estrogen metabolic pathway may not play a direct role in breast cancer risk. Therefore, future association studies should be extended to other polymorphisms and other regulatory pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588204     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9586-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  Genetic variation in the sex hormone metabolic pathway and endometriosis risk: an evaluation of candidate genes.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Stephen M Schwartz; Ulrike Peters; Anneclaire J De Roos; Chu Chen; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Try113His and His139Arg polymorphisms in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene are not associated with risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Feng Gong; Wen He; Qiu-Ming Zhang; Bang-De Xiang; Liang Ma; Shan Huang; Tao Bai; Jian-Hong Zhong; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-20

3.  Estrogen metabolism and exposure in a genotypic-phenotypic model for breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Philip S Crooke; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Sheila Dawling; Nady Roodi; Kathryn S P Higginbotham; W Dale Plummer; Peggy A Schuyler; Melinda E Sanders; David L Page; Jeffrey R Smith; William D Dupont; Fritz F Parl
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Importance measures for epistatic interactions in case-parent trios.

Authors:  Holger Schwender; Katherine Bowers; M Daniele Fallin; Ingo Ruczinski
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  There is no relationship between SOD2 Val-16Ala polymorphism and breast cancer risk or survival.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Yang Liu; Jian Zhou; Lei Ye; Nan Chen; Min Zhu; Yulin Ji
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-14

6.  Estrogen-related genes and their contribution to racial differences in breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kerryn W Reding; Chu Chen; Kimberly Lowe; David R Doody; Christopher S Carlson; Christina T Chen; John Houck; Linda K Weiss; Polly A Marchbanks; Leslie Bernstein; Robert Spirtas; Jill A McDonald; Brian L Strom; Ronald T Burkman; Michael S Simon; Jonathan M Liff; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Maternal dioxin exposure combined with a diet high in fat increases mammary cancer incidence in mice.

Authors:  Michele La Merrill; Rachel Harper; Linda S Birnbaum; Robert D Cardiff; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  HSD17B1 genetic variants and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Stephen Chanock; Alison Dunning; Kristy Driver; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Peplonska; Paul Pharoah; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Breast cancer risk reduction and membrane-bound catechol O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Janet Olson; Jianping Zhang; Michelle Hildebrandt; Liewei Wang; James Ingle; Zachary Fredericksen; Thomas Sellers; William Miller; J Michael Dixon; Hiltrud Brauch; Michel Eichelbaum; Christina Justenhoven; Ute Hamann; Yon Ko; Thomas Brüning; Jenny Chang-Claude; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Daniel Schaid; Richard Weinshilboum
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  CYP1A1 and GSTP1 gene variations in breast cancer: a systematic review and case-control study.

Authors:  Sumaira Akhtar; Ishrat Mahjabeen; Zertashia Akram; Mahmood Akhtar Kayani
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.