Literature DB >> 17587774

Effective suppression of bystander effects by DMSO treatment of irradiated CHO cells.

Genro Kashino1, Kevin M Prise, Keiji Suzuki, Naoki Matsuda, Seiji Kodama, Minoru Suzuki, Kenji Nagata, Yuko Kinashi, Shin-Ichiro Masunaga, Koji Ono, Masami Watanabe.   

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that irradiated cells produce some signals which interact with non-exposed cells in the same population via a bystander effect. Here, we examined whether DMSO is effective in suppressing radiation induced bystander effects in CHO and repair deficient xrs5 cells. When 1 Gy-irradiated CHO cells were treated with 0.5% DMSO for 1 hr before irradiation, the induction of micronuclei in irradiated cells was suppressed to 80% of that in non-treated irradiated cells. The suppressive effect of DMSO on the formation of bystander signals was examined and the results demonstrated that 0.5% DMSO treatment of irradiated cells completely suppressed the induction of micronuclei by the bystander effect in non-irradiated cells. It is suggested that irradiated cells ceased signal formation for bystander effects by the action of DMSO. To determine the involvement of reactive oxygen species on the formation of bystander signals, we examined oxidative stress levels using the DCFH staining method in irradiated populations. The results showed that the treatment of irradiated cells with 0.5% DMSO did not suppress oxidative stress levels. These results suggest that the prevention of oxidative stress is independent of the suppressive effect of DMSO on the formation of the bystander signal in irradiated cells. It is suggested that increased ROS in irradiated cells is not a substantial trigger of a bystander signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587774     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.07008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  6 in total

1.  Radiation-induced bystander effect in large Japanese field mouse (Apodemus speciosus) embryonic cells.

Authors:  Kentaro Ariyoshi; Tomisato Miura; Kosuke Kasai; Nakata Akifumi; Yohei Fujishima; Mitsuaki A Yoshida
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Intercellular communication of cellular stress monitored by gamma-H2AX induction.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Brandon J Baird; Christophe E Redon; Mykyta V Sokolov; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Role of oxidatively induced DNA lesions in human pathogenesis.

Authors:  Olga A Sedelnikova; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Alexandros G Georgakilas; William M Bonner
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Ursolic acid sensitizes radioresistant NSCLC cells expressing HIF-1α through reducing endogenous GSH and inhibiting HIF-1α.

Authors:  Bing Song; Qian Zhang; Maohu Yu; Xinrong Qi; Gang Wang; Linlin Xiao; Qiyi Yi; Wensen Jin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect: Loss of Radioprotective Capacity of Rosmarinic Acid In Vivo and In Vitro.

Authors:  Amparo Olivares; Miguel Alcaraz-Saura; Daniel Gyingiri Achel; Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre; Miguel Alcaraz
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  Radioprotective effect on HepG2 cells of low concentrations of cobalt chloride: induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and clearance of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Wensen Jin; Juan Wang; Shiguo Xu; Linlin Xiao; Guangfu Chen; Wukui Zhang; Jun Li
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.