Literature DB >> 1758755

Outcome of home care for technology-dependent children: success of an independent, community-based case management model.

A I Fields1, D H Coble, M M Pollack, J Kaufman.   

Abstract

Case management is important for successful home care of technology-dependent, respiratory-disabled children. Traditionally, the medical model of hospital-based home care and case management has been used for these children. The outcome may be different from when using independent, community-based home care and case management. We evaluated the results of 28 technology-dependent children [23 receiving mechanical ventilation and 5 receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)] from 8 hospitals, who utilized an independent, community-based, case management group to coordinate home care. After 26.3 +/- 20.6 months of follow-up, 13 children (46%) remained technology-dependent, 10 (36%) were technology-independent, and 5 (18%), all with neurologic dysfunction, had died. Only one death was caused by a complication of technology. All children with congenital anomalies (n = 4), primary pulmonary disease (n = 8), and neuromuscular disease (n = 4) survived, and 9 (56%) were weaned from technological support. Children with chronic respiratory failure secondary to central neurologic dysfunction (n = 12) did poorly: 5 died, 6 remained technology-dependent, and only 1 became independent of technology. Children with neuromuscular diseases tended to use less home care nursing at a lower home care cost. Parent satisfaction was high among those who responded (82%), indicating that the child, siblings, and family were better off with the child at home. These outcomes suggest that community-based home care and case management is a reasonable alternative to the hospital-based model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1758755     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950110407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ventilatory support at home for children: A joint position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand/Australasian Sleep Association.

Authors:  Jasneek Chawla; Elizabeth A Edwards; Amanda L Griffiths; Gillian M Nixon; Sadasivam Suresh; Jacob Twiss; Moya Vandeleur; Karen A Waters; Andrew C Wilson; Susan Wilson; Andrew Tai
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.175

2.  Liberation and mortality outcomes in pediatric long-term ventilation: A qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Candice M Foy; Monica L Koncicki; Jeffrey D Edwards
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2020-08-12

3.  Core guidelines for the discharge home of the child on long-term assisted ventilation in the United Kingdom. UK Working Party on Paediatric Long Term Ventilation.

Authors:  E Jardine; C Wallis
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Outcomes of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia who were ventilator dependent at home.

Authors:  A Ioana Cristea; Aaron E Carroll; Stephanie D Davis; Nancy L Swigonski; Veda L Ackerman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.124

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.