Literature DB >> 17586452

Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

M Mohebali1, A Fotouhi, B Hooshmand, Z Zarei, B Akhoundi, A Rahnema, A R Razaghian, M J Kabir, A Nadim.   

Abstract

This study was a randomized, open label comparison that was designed to determine efficacy and safety of miltefosine as the first oral drug for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major in comparison with meglumine antimoniate. Complete clinical response was defined as 100% re-epithelialization of the lesion. Definitions of lesion cure and failure were based on both clinical and parasitological criteria two weeks after the end of treatment and clinical recovery three months after this period. Of 32 patients enrolled for miltefosine treatment 28 patients completed treatment, of which 26 were cured at three months, corresponding to a cure rate of 92.9% on a per protocol analysis, and 81.3% according to intention to treat analysis. There was one failure (3.1%), one relapse (3.1%) and four dropouts due to lack of tolerability (12.5%) during the first week of treatment. Of 31 patients who received intramuscular meglumine antimoniate (20mgSb(5)/kg body weight daily for 14 days) 25 were cured (83.3% on a per protocol basis, 80.6% on intention to treat basis), five failed (16.1%) and one was lost (3.2%) at 3-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up after the end of treatment, no relapse was observed. Both regimens were tolerated but averages of nausea (32.2%) and vomiting (21.5%) were observed in patients during two weeks after initiation of miltefosine treatment. Other gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and total adverse events were not statistically different in the two groups during one to four weeks after therapy initiation. No relevant changes were observed in levels of liver enzymes, creatinine and hematological tests before and after end of treatment in both groups. In conclusion, miltefosine is apparently at least as good as meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major in Iran, based on parasitological as well as clinical criteria two weeks, three months, and six months after end of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586452     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  51 in total

1.  The antileishmanial effects of Lowsonia inermis and Cedrus libani on Leishmania major promastigotes: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Motazedian; Fattaneh Mikaeili; Mehdi Mohebali; Ramin Miri; Parvaneh Habibi; Sakineh Kamarloie
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 2.  Therapeutic options for old world cutaneous leishmaniasis and new world cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Begoña Monge-Maillo; Rogelio López-Vélez
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers: a focus on epidemiology and treatment in 2015.

Authors:  Adrienne J Showler; Andrea K Boggild
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Julio Heras-Mosteiro; Begoña Monge-Maillo; Mariona Pinart; Patricia Lopez Pereira; Ludovic Reveiz; Emely Garcia-Carrasco; Pedro Campuzano Cuadrado; Ana Royuela; Irene Mendez Roman; Rogelio López-Vélez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-17

Review 5.  An update on pharmacotherapy for leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Shyam Sundar; Jaya Chakravarty
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  Miltefosine efficiently eliminates Leishmania major amastigotes from infected murine dendritic cells without altering their immune functions.

Authors:  Klaus Griewank; Caroline Gazeau; Andreas Eichhorn; Esther von Stebut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Case Report: Old World Mucosal Leishmaniasis: Report of Five Imported Cases to the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Trupti A Patel; Glenis K Scadding; David E Phillips; Diana N Lockwood
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Abderrahmen Masmoudi; Wala Hariz; Slaheddine Marrekchi; Mariem Amouri; Hamida Turki
Journal:  J Dermatol Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 9.  Leishmaniasis: new insights from an old and neglected disease.

Authors:  S Antinori; L Schifanella; M Corbellino
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Novel arylalkylamine compounds exhibits potent selective antiparasitic activity against Leishmania major.

Authors:  Eva A Iniguez; Andrea Perez; Rosa A Maldonado; Rachid Skouta
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.