PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of radiofrequency energy to correct advanced keratoconus. SETTING: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, and Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil. METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, radiofrequency was applied to 25 eyes of 21 consecutive patients. One group comprised patients with a K-reading between 54.0 diopters (D) and 58.0 D; 8 thermal spots were placed at the 4.0 mm optical zone. The other group comprised patients with a K-reading greater than 58.0 D; 16 spots were applied at the 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm optical zones. The minimum follow-up was 18 months in all patients. Differences between preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and K-readings were clinically and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: At end of the 18-month follow-up, the mean BSCVA in the 8-spot group improved from 20/100 (0.71+/-0.25 logMAR) preoperatively to 20/40 (0.32+/-0.11 logMAR) and in the 16-spot group, from 20/200 (1.03+/-0.30 logMAR) to 20/60 (0.62+/-0.22 logMAR). The mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) improved from -7.70 D+/-5.20 (SD) preoperatively to -6.82+/-4.41 D after 18 months in the 8-spot group and from -11.33+/-6.70 to -8.38+/-5.12 D, respectively, in the 16-spot group. The mean best contact lens-corrected visual acuity was 20/30 (0.18+/-0.24 logMAR) in the 8-spot group and 20/40 (0.31+/-0.19 logMAR) in the 16-spot group. A dense corneal scar was seen in 1 patient in the 16-spot group at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency appeared safe for the treatment of advanced keratoconus. Contact lens fitting was stable in all cases.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of radiofrequency energy to correct advanced keratoconus. SETTING: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, and Universidade de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil. METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, radiofrequency was applied to 25 eyes of 21 consecutive patients. One group comprised patients with a K-reading between 54.0 diopters (D) and 58.0 D; 8 thermal spots were placed at the 4.0 mm optical zone. The other group comprised patients with a K-reading greater than 58.0 D; 16 spots were applied at the 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm optical zones. The minimum follow-up was 18 months in all patients. Differences between preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and K-readings were clinically and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: At end of the 18-month follow-up, the mean BSCVA in the 8-spot group improved from 20/100 (0.71+/-0.25 logMAR) preoperatively to 20/40 (0.32+/-0.11 logMAR) and in the 16-spot group, from 20/200 (1.03+/-0.30 logMAR) to 20/60 (0.62+/-0.22 logMAR). The mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) improved from -7.70 D+/-5.20 (SD) preoperatively to -6.82+/-4.41 D after 18 months in the 8-spot group and from -11.33+/-6.70 to -8.38+/-5.12 D, respectively, in the 16-spot group. The mean best contact lens-corrected visual acuity was 20/30 (0.18+/-0.24 logMAR) in the 8-spot group and 20/40 (0.31+/-0.19 logMAR) in the 16-spot group. A dense corneal scar was seen in 1 patient in the 16-spot group at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency appeared safe for the treatment of advanced keratoconus. Contact lens fitting was stable in all cases.
Authors: Mazen M Sinjab; Roy S Rubinfeld; Kirsten Wagner; Edward C Parsons Jnr; Arthur B Cummings; Michael W Belin Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-03-29
Authors: Vardhaman P Kankariya; Ankita B Dube; Michael A Grentzelos; George A Kontadakis; Vasilios F Diakonis; Myrsini Petrelli; George D Kymionis Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.848