Literature DB >> 17586149

Direct composite restorative materials.

Aaron D Puckett1, James G Fitchie, Pia Chaterjee Kirk, Jefferson Gamblin.   

Abstract

Composite dental restorative materials have advanced considerably over the past 10 years. Although composites have not totally replaced amalgam, they have become a viable substitute in many situations. Problems still exist with polymerization contraction stress, large differences in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of composites compared with tooth structure, and with some technique sensitivity; however, new expanding resins, nanofiller technology, and improved bonding systems have the potential to reduce these problems. With increased patient demands for esthetic restorations, the use of direct filling composite materials will continue to grow. The one major caveat to this prediction is that clinicians must continue to use sound judgment on when, where, and how to use composite restoratives in their practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586149     DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Clin North Am        ISSN: 0011-8532


  9 in total

1.  Influence of Full Veneer Restoration on Fracture Resistance of Three Different Core Materials: An Invitro Study.

Authors:  S A Mohamed Ali; P S Manoharan; Kuldeep Singh Shekhawat; Saikat Deb; S Chidambaram; Jagadish Konchada; Nirupa Venugopal; Harish Vadivel
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Contributions on the study of the compressive strength of the light-cured composite resins.

Authors:  H Manolea; Sonia Degeratu; V Deva; Evantia Coles; Emma Draghici
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2009-03-21

3.  Effects of sports beverages and polishing systems on color stability of different resin composites.

Authors:  Ertan Taşkınsel; Emre Ozel; Elif Oztürk
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-07

4.  The effect of bonding and surface sealant application on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites.

Authors:  Neslihan Tekce; Mustafa Demirci; Sultan Aslıhan Gokturk; Safa Tuncer; Emre Ozel; Kansad Pala; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-10-21

5.  Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure.

Authors:  Khalid M Abdelaziz; Ahmed A Saleh
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Effects of deformation rate variation on biaxial flexural properties of dental resin composites.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Muhammad S Zafar; Waheed M Dahri; Muhammad A Khan; Zohaib Khurshid; Shariq Najeeb
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

7.  Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics.

Authors:  Scott A Saunders
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-11-30

8.  Color stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media.

Authors:  Silvia Terra Fontes; María Raquel Fernández; Claudia Modena de Moura; Sônia Saeger Meireles
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing.

Authors:  Veena S Nair; Shan Sainudeen; Prabeesh Padmanabhan; L V Vijayashankar; Unu Sujathan; Rajesh Pillai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.