RATIONALE: Current American-European Consensus Conference definitions for acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are inadequate for inclusion into clinical trials due to the lack of standardization for measuring the oxygenation defect. OBJECTIVES: We questioned whether an early assessment of oxygenation on specific ventilator settings would identify patients with established ARDS (persisting over 24 h). METHODS: At the time of meeting ARDS criteria (Day 0) and 24 hours later (Day 1), arterial blood gases were obtained on standard ventilator settings, Vt 7 ml/kg predicted body weight plus the following positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and Fi(O(2)) settings in sequence: (1) PEEP >or= 5 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) >or= 0.5, (2) PEEP >or= 5 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) 1.0, (3) PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2))>or=0.5, and (4) PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) 1.0. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients meeting ARDS criteria (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) 128 +/- 33 mm Hg) were enrolled. Overall hospital mortality was 34.1%. The standard ventilator settings that best identified patients with established ARDS and predicted differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality were PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) >or= 0.5 at Day 1 (P = 0.0001). Only 99 (58.2%) patients continued to meet ARDS criteria (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 155.8 +/- 29.8 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 45.5%), whereas 55 patients were reclassified as having ALI (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 246.5 +/- 25.6 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 20%) and 16 patients as having acute respiratory failure (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 370 +/- 54 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 6.3%) (P = 0.0001) on these settings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients meeting current American-European Consensus Conference ARDS criteria may have highly variable levels of lung injury and outcomes. A systematic method of assessing severity of lung injury is required for enrollment of patients with ARDS into randomized controlled trials. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00435110).
RATIONALE: Current American-European Consensus Conference definitions for acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are inadequate for inclusion into clinical trials due to the lack of standardization for measuring the oxygenation defect. OBJECTIVES: We questioned whether an early assessment of oxygenation on specific ventilator settings would identify patients with established ARDS (persisting over 24 h). METHODS: At the time of meeting ARDS criteria (Day 0) and 24 hours later (Day 1), arterial blood gases were obtained on standard ventilator settings, Vt 7 ml/kg predicted body weight plus the following positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and Fi(O(2)) settings in sequence: (1) PEEP >or= 5 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) >or= 0.5, (2) PEEP >or= 5 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) 1.0, (3) PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2))>or=0.5, and (4) PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) 1.0. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients meeting ARDS criteria (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) 128 +/- 33 mm Hg) were enrolled. Overall hospital mortality was 34.1%. The standard ventilator settings that best identified patients with established ARDS and predicted differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality were PEEP >or= 10 cm H(2)O and Fi(O(2)) >or= 0.5 at Day 1 (P = 0.0001). Only 99 (58.2%) patients continued to meet ARDS criteria (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 155.8 +/- 29.8 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 45.5%), whereas 55 patients were reclassified as having ALI (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 246.5 +/- 25.6 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 20%) and 16 patients as having acute respiratory failure (Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)), 370 +/- 54 mm Hg; ICU mortality, 6.3%) (P = 0.0001) on these settings. CONCLUSIONS:Patients meeting current American-European Consensus Conference ARDS criteria may have highly variable levels of lung injury and outcomes. A systematic method of assessing severity of lung injury is required for enrollment of patients with ARDS into randomized controlled trials. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00435110).
Authors: Jesús Villar; Jesús Blanco; José Manuel Añón; Antonio Santos-Bouza; Lluís Blanch; Alfonso Ambrós; Francisco Gandía; Demetrio Carriedo; Fernando Mosteiro; Santiago Basaldúa; Rosa Lidia Fernández; Robert M Kacmarek Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Giora Netzer; David W Dowdy; Thelma Harrington; Satish Chandolu; Victor D Dinglas; Nirav G Shah; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Carl Shanholtz; Jeffrey D Hasday; Dale M Needham Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2013-12
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Lisa A Asaro; Heidi R Flori; Geoffrey L Allen; David Wypij; Martha A Q Curley Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Roger G Spragg; Gordon R Bernard; William Checkley; J Randall Curtis; Ognjen Gajic; Gordon Guyatt; Jesse Hall; Elliott Israel; Manu Jain; Dale M Needham; Adrienne G Randolph; Gordon D Rubenfeld; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Lorraine B Ware; Duncan Young; Andrea L Harabin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Cyril Charron; Koceila Bouferrache; Vincent Caille; Samuel Castro; Philippe Aegerter; Bernard Page; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Edward J Schenck; Clara Oromendia; Lisa K Torres; David A Berlin; Augustine M K Choi; Ilias I Siempos Journal: Chest Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 9.410