Literature DB >> 17584853

Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.

Alberto Priori1, F Mameli, F Cogiamanian, S Marceglia, M Tiriticco, S Mrakic-Sposta, R Ferrucci, S Zago, D Polezzi, G Sartori.   

Abstract

Lies are intentional distortions of event knowledge. No experimental data are available on manipulating lying processes. To address this issue, we stimulated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Fifteen healthy volunteers were tested before and after tDCS (anodal, cathodal, and sham). Two types of truthful (truthful selected: TS; truthful unselected: TU) and deceptive (lie selected: LS; lie unselected: LU) responses were evaluated using a computer-controlled task. Reaction times (RTs) and accuracy were collected and used as dependent variables. In the baseline task, the RT was significantly longer for lie responses than for true responses ([mean +/- standard error] 1153.4 +/- 42.0 ms vs. 1039.6 +/- 36.6 ms; F(1,14) = 27.25, P = 0.00013). At baseline, RT for selected pictures was significantly shorter than RT for unselected pictures (1051.26 +/- 39.0 ms vs. 1141.76 +/- 41.1 ms; F(1,14) = 34.85, P = 0.00004). Whereas after cathodal and sham stimulation, lie responses remained unchanged (cathodal 5.26 +/- 2.7%; sham 5.66 +/- 3.6%), after anodal tDCS, RTs significantly increased but did so only for LS responses (16.86 +/- 5.0%; P = 0.002). These findings show that manipulation of brain function with DLPFC tDCS specifically influences experimental deception and that distinctive neural mechanisms underlie different types of lies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584853     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  55 in total

1.  Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions.

Authors:  Yves Vandermeeren; Jacques Jamart; Michel Ossemann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments.

Authors:  Liane Young; Joan Albert Camprodon; Marc Hauser; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial.

Authors:  Angela Valle; Suely Roizenblatt; Sueli Botte; Soroush Zaghi; Marcelo Riberto; Sergio Tufik; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009

4.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Rethinking the thinking cap: ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Roy Hamilton; Samuel Messing; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Gabriel Tortella; Roberta Casati; Luana V M Aparicio; Antonio Mantovani; Natasha Senço; Giordano D'Urso; Jerome Brunelin; Fabiana Guarienti; Priscila Mara Lorencini Selingardi; Débora Muszkat; Bernardo de Sampaio Pereira Junior; Leandro Valiengo; Adriano H Moffa; Marcel Simis; Lucas Borrione; André R Brunoni
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-22

7.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not influence the neural adjustments associated with fatiguing contractions in a hand muscle.

Authors:  Achraf Abdelmoula; Stéphane Baudry; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Brain switches utilitarian behavior: does gender make the difference?

Authors:  Manuela Fumagalli; Maurizio Vergari; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Sara Marceglia; Francesca Mameli; Roberta Ferrucci; Simona Mrakic-Sposta; Stefano Zago; Giuseppe Sartori; Gabriella Pravettoni; Sergio Barbieri; Stefano Cappa; Alberto Priori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lying about the valence of affective pictures: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tatia M C Lee; Tiffany M Y Lee; Adrian Raine; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Toshikatsu Fujii; Kazumi Hirayama; Atsushi Takeda; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Toshiyuki Ishioka; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Kyoko Suzuki; Yasuto Itoyama; Shoki Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.