BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular prognostic significance of relative wall thickness (RWT) in patients with diabetes has not been reported although concentric hypertrophy is common in diabetic patients. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the prognostic significance of different measures of left ventricular (LV) geometric change, principally LV mass index (LVMI) and RWT, would be different in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic individuals among Japanese hypertensive subjects. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography were performed in 400 uncomplicated hypertensive individuals at baseline, of whom 379 (157 with diabetes and 222 without diabetes; mean age 67.8 +/- 8.8 years) were successfully followed up for 63 +/- 26 months to document cardiovascular events. We dichotomized LVMI and RWT to the highest quartile vs other 3 quartiles for further categoric analyses in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. RESULTS: Fifty-three cardiovascular events occurred during the follow-up period. With Kaplan-Meier analysis, both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with the highest quartile of LVMI showed a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular vents. However, the highest quartile of RWT was associated with cardiovascular events only in diabetic subjects. With Cox regression analyses controlling for age, sex, body mass index, serum creatinine, triglycerides, and clinic systolic blood pressure, RWT (per 0.01 change), but not LVMI, was associated with cardiovascular events in diabetic patients (relative risk: 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.11; P = .008), whereas LVMI (g/m2), but not RWT, was associated with cardiovascular events in nondiabetic patients (relative risk: 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.03; P = .005). CONCLUSION: In hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, echocardiographic LV RWT is a predictor of cardiovascular events independent of LV mass and other confounders.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular prognostic significance of relative wall thickness (RWT) in patients with diabetes has not been reported although concentric hypertrophy is common in diabeticpatients. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the prognostic significance of different measures of left ventricular (LV) geometric change, principally LV mass index (LVMI) and RWT, would be different in diabeticpatients compared with nondiabetic individuals among Japanese hypertensive subjects. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography were performed in 400 uncomplicated hypertensive individuals at baseline, of whom 379 (157 with diabetes and 222 without diabetes; mean age 67.8 +/- 8.8 years) were successfully followed up for 63 +/- 26 months to document cardiovascular events. We dichotomized LVMI and RWT to the highest quartile vs other 3 quartiles for further categoric analyses in diabetic and nondiabeticpatients. RESULTS: Fifty-three cardiovascular events occurred during the follow-up period. With Kaplan-Meier analysis, both diabetic and nondiabeticpatients with the highest quartile of LVMI showed a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular vents. However, the highest quartile of RWT was associated with cardiovascular events only in diabetic subjects. With Cox regression analyses controlling for age, sex, body mass index, serum creatinine, triglycerides, and clinic systolic blood pressure, RWT (per 0.01 change), but not LVMI, was associated with cardiovascular events in diabeticpatients (relative risk: 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.11; P = .008), whereas LVMI (g/m2), but not RWT, was associated with cardiovascular events in nondiabeticpatients (relative risk: 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.03; P = .005). CONCLUSION: In hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, echocardiographic LV RWT is a predictor of cardiovascular events independent of LV mass and other confounders.
Authors: Khiet Hoang; Yanglu Zhao; Julius M Gardin; Mercedes Carnethon; Ken Mukamal; David Yanez; Nathan D Wong Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-26
Authors: Samuel S Gidding; Mercedes R Carnethon; Stephen Daniels; Kiang Liu; David R Jacobs; Steve Sidney; Julius Gardin Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Elena N Libhaber; Gavin R Norton; Carlos D Libhaber; Angela J Woodiwiss; Geoffrey P Candy; Mohammed R Essop; Pinhas Sareli Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 1.167
Authors: M-Sherif Hashem; Hayrapet Kalashyan; Jonathan Choy; Soon K Chiew; Abdel-Hakim Shawki; Ahmed H Dawood; Harald Becher Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Omar Asghar; Ahmed Al-Sunni; Kaivan Khavandi; Ali Khavandi; Sarah Withers; Adam Greenstein; Anthony M Heagerty; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.124