Literature DB >> 17584285

Age-related changes in static accommodation and accommodative miosis.

Hema Radhakrishnan1, W Neil Charman.   

Abstract

An attempt was made to explore the validity of the Hess-Gullstrand and Duane-Fincham models of presbyopia development, on the assumption that accommodative miosis could be used as an indicator of ciliary muscle effort. Monocular accommodation response and pupil size were measured as a function of accommodation demand over the range 0-4 D, in 48 normal subjects with ages between 17 and 56 years. The slope of the response/stimulus curve was found to decrease only slowly with age up to about 35 years and then to decline more rapidly. Accommodative miosis per dioptre of accommodation response did not change systematically with age up to about 35 years, this being apparently more in accord with the Hess-Gullstrand model. However, accommodative miosis varied very widely between younger subjects of similar age and accommodative amplitude (from zero to around 1 mm per dioptre of accommodation response for subjects in their twenties). It is concluded that miosis does not necessarily accompany accommodation and that its magnitude is not related in any simple general way to ciliary muscle contraction. Hence it cannot be used to support or refute particular theories of presbyopia.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584285     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00484.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Accommodative accuracy by retinoscopy versus autorefraction spherical equivalent or horizontal meridian power.

Authors:  Angeline T Nguyen; Jenna L Wayne; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Technical Note: Effects of age and confinement on pupillary light reflex in sows1.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Hanqing Sun; Lei Zhang; Honggui Liu; Jianhong Li; Chao Wang; Mingyue Zhang; Jun Bao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  Rajaraman Suryakumar; Robert Allison
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-04-16

6.  Simultaneous Measurement of Objective and Subjective Accommodation in Response to Step Stimulation.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  In Vitro and In-Eye Comparison of Commercial Pilocarpine Ophthalmic Solution and an Optimized, Reformulated Pilocarpine for Presbyopia Treatment.

Authors:  Mitchell A Jackson; Jaya Giyanani; Yumna Shabaik; Jeff Penzner; Anuradha V Gore; Michael R Robinson; George O Waring
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?

Authors:  Hanyang Yu; Wentao Li; Ziping Chen; Mengzhen Chen; Junwen Zeng; Xijiang Lin; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Combinations of Pilocarpine and Oxymetazoline for the Pharmacological Treatment of Presbyopia: Two Randomized Phase 2 Studies.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Milton Hom; Majid Moshirfar; David Evans; Haixia Liu; Jeff Penzner; Michael R Robinson; Sungwook Lee; David L Wirta
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-10-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.