Literature DB >> 17584237

When can host shifts produce congruent host and parasite phylogenies? A simulation approach.

D M de Vienne1, T Giraud, J A Shykoff.   

Abstract

Congruence between host and parasite phylogenies is often taken as evidence for cospeciation. However, 'pseudocospeciation', resulting from host-switches followed by parasite speciation, may also generate congruent trees. To investigate this process and the conditions favouring its appearance, we here simulated the adaptive radiation of a parasite onto a new range of hosts. A very high congruence between the host tree and the resulting parasite trees was obtained when parasites switched between closely related hosts. Setting a shorter time lag for speciation after switches between distantly related hosts further increased the degree of congruence. The shape of the host tree, however, had a strong impact, as no congruence could be obtained when starting with highly unbalanced host trees. The strong congruences obtained were erroneously interpreted as the result of cospeciations by commonly used phylogenetic software packages despite the fact that all speciations resulted from host-switches in our model. These results highlight the importance of estimating the age of nodes in host and parasite phylogenies when testing for cospeciation and also demonstrate that the results obtained with software packages simulating evolutionary events must be interpreted with caution.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584237     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  19 in total

1.  Host-plant specificity and specialization in eriophyoid mites and their importance for the use of eriophyoid mites as biocontrol agents of weeds.

Authors:  Anna Skoracka; Lincoln Smith; George Oldfield; Massimo Cristofaro; James W Amrine
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Revised time scales of RNA virus evolution based on spatial information.

Authors:  Moritz Saxenhofer; Vanessa Weber de Melo; Rainer G Ulrich; Gerald Heckel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem.

Authors:  Chris Conow; Daniel Fielder; Yaniv Ovadia; Ran Libeskind-Hadas
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  Genomic fossils calibrate the long-term evolution of hepadnaviruses.

Authors:  Clément Gilbert; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Speciation in Thaparocleidus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) parasitizing Asian Pangasiid catfishes.

Authors:  Andrea Simková; Celine Serbielle; Antoine Pariselle; Maarten P M Vanhove; Serge Morand
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  EUCALYPT: efficient tree reconciliation enumerator.

Authors:  Beatrice Donati; Christian Baudet; Blerina Sinaimeri; Pierluigi Crescenzi; Marie-France Sagot
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.405

7.  Cyto-nuclear discordance in the phylogeny of Ficus section Galoglychia and host shifts in plant-pollinator associations.

Authors:  Julien P Renoult; Finn Kjellberg; Cinderella Grout; Sylvain Santoni; Bouchaïb Khadari
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  PACo: a novel procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Balbuena; Raúl Míguez-Lozano; Isabel Blasco-Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their caryophyllaceous hosts: prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species for inferring cospeciation.

Authors:  Guislaine Refrégier; Mickaël Le Gac; Florian Jabbour; Alex Widmer; Jacqui A Shykoff; Roxana Yockteng; Michael E Hood; Tatiana Giraud
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Cophylogenetic interactions between marine viruses and eukaryotic picophytoplankton.

Authors:  Laure Bellec; Camille Clerissi; Roseline Edern; Elodie Foulon; Nathalie Simon; Nigel Grimsley; Yves Desdevises
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.