Literature DB >> 17584017

Evaluation of human pharmacokinetics, therapeutic dose and exposure predictions using marketed oral drugs.

D F McGinnity1, J Collington, R P Austin, R J Riley.   

Abstract

In this article approaches to predict human pharmacokinetics (PK) are discussed and the capability of the exemplified methodologies to estimate individual PK parameters and therapeutic dose for a set of marketed oral drugs has been assessed. For a set of 63 drugs where the minimum efficacious concentration (MEC) and human PK were known, the clinical dose was shown to be well predicted or in some cases over-estimated using a simple one-compartment oral PK model. For a subset of these drugs, in vitro potency against the primary human targets was gathered, and compared to the observed MEC. When corrected for plasma protein binding, the MEC of the majority of compounds was < or=3 fold over the respective in vitro target potency value. A series of in vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to predict the human PK parameters. Metabolic clearance was generally predicted well from human hepatocytes. Interestingly, for this compound set, allometry or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ratio methods appeared to be applicable for renal CL even where CL(renal) > GFR. For approximately 90% of compounds studied, the predicted CL using in vitro-in vivo (IVIV) extrapolation together with a CL(renal) estimate, where appropriate, was within 2-fold of that observed clinically. Encouragingly volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) estimated in preclinical species (rat and dog) when corrected for plasma protein binding, predicted human V(ss) successfully on the majority of occasions--73% of compounds within 2-fold. In this laboratory, absorption estimated from oral rat PK studies was lower than the observed human absorption for most drugs, even when solubility and permeability appeared not to be limiting. Preliminary data indicate absorption in the dog may be more representative of human for compounds absorbed via the transcellular pathway. Using predicted PK and MEC values estimated from in vitro potency assays there was a good correlation between predicted and observed dose. This analysis suggests that for oral therapies, human PK parameters and clinical dose can be estimated from a consideration of data obtained from in vitro screens using human derived material and in vivo animal studies. The benefits and limitations of this holistic approach to PK and dose prediction within the drug discovery process are exemplified and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584017     DOI: 10.2174/138920007780866799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Drug Metab        ISSN: 1389-2002            Impact factor:   3.731


  14 in total

Review 1.  The influence of the 'organizational factor' on compound quality in drug discovery.

Authors:  Paul D Leeson; Stephen A St-Gallay
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Why Decreasing Lipophilicity Alone Is Often Not a Reliable Strategy for Extending IV Half-life.

Authors:  Fabio Broccatelli; Ignacio Aliagas; Hao Zheng
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Effect of the Plasticizer DEHP in Blood Collection Bags on Human Plasma Fraction Unbound Determination for Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) Binding Drugs.

Authors:  Nicholas Ingram; Christopher Dishinger; Jennifer Wood; J Matthew Hutzler; Sherri Smith; Michael Huskin
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters.

Authors:  M Paul Gleeson; Anne Hersey; Dino Montanari; John Overington
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Gut Wall Metabolism. Application of Pre-Clinical Models for the Prediction of Human Drug Absorption and First-Pass Elimination.

Authors:  Christopher R Jones; Oliver J D Hatley; Anna-Lena Ungell; Constanze Hilgendorf; Sheila Annie Peters; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Pharmacodynamic model of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition: implications for quantitative translational pharmacology.

Authors:  Tristan S Maurer; Avijit Ghosh; Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Aarti Sawant-Basak; Carine M Boustany-Kari; Li She; Michael T Leininger; Tong Zhu; Meera Tugnait; Xin Yang; Emi Kimoto; Vincent Mascitti; Ralph P Robinson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Benchmarking of Human Dose Prediction for Inhaled Medicines from Preclinical In Vivo Data.

Authors:  Therese Ericsson; Markus Fridén; Carina Kärrman-Mårdh; Ian Dainty; Ken Grime
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Designing safer oral drugs.

Authors:  M C Wenlock
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.597

9.  In vitro pharmacological profiling of R406 identifies molecular targets underlying the clinical effects of fostamatinib.

Authors:  Michael G Rolf; Jon O Curwen; Margaret Veldman-Jones; Cath Eberlein; Jianyan Wang; Alex Harmer; Caroline J Hellawell; Martin Braddock
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2015-09-04

10.  Neutrophil maturation rate determines the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 inhibition on neutrophil serine protease activity.

Authors:  P Gardiner; C Wikell; S Clifton; J Shearer; A Benjamin; S A Peters
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.