Literature DB >> 17583987

Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials.

Mike Wendt1, Marcus Heldmann, Thomas F Münte, Rainer H Kluwe.   

Abstract

Conflict monitoring theory holds that detection of conflicts in information processing by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) results in processing adaptation that minimizes subsequent conflict. Applying an Eriksen f lanker task with four stimuli mapped onto two responses, we investigated whether such modulation occurs only after response-related or also after stimulus-related conflict, focusing on the N2 component of the event-related potential. Contrasting with previous findings, both stimulus- and response-related conflict elicited enhancement of the N2, suggesting that the ACC is sensitive to conflict at both the stimulus and the response level. However, neither type of conflict resulted in reduced conflict effects on the following trial when stimulus-response (S-R) sequence effects were controlled by excluding identical S-R repetition trials. Identical S-R repetitions were associated with facilitated processing, thus demonstrating that inclusion of these trials in the analysis may mimic results predicted by the conflict adaptation hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17583987     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  31 in total

1.  The mental number line electrified: brain potentials in a numerical flanker task.

Authors:  Anja Fellbrich; Wido Nager; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-05

2.  Psychophysiological Evidence of Response Conflict and Strategic Control of Responses in Affective Priming.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Monica A Schepers Riordan; J Scott Saults; Sarah A Lust
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03-05

3.  Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Miriam Tomat; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Michael Sprengel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-06

4.  No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response.

Authors:  Nathalie Schouppe; Senne Braem; Jan De Houwer; Massimo Silvetti; Tom Verguts; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Parametric manipulation of the conflict signal and control-state adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Cameron S Carter; Jonathan D Cohen; Raymond Y Cho
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The electrophysiological time course of the interaction of stimulus conflict and the multisensory spread of attention.

Authors:  U Zimmer; S Itthipanyanan; T Grent-'t-Jong; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Anling Rao; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; John K Kruschke; Raymond Y Cho; Philip M Walker; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

10.  Different methods to define utility functions yield similar results but engage different neural processes.

Authors:  Marcus Heldmann; Bodo Vogt; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.