Literature DB >> 1758327

Complementary value of traditional bedside teaching and structured clinical teaching in introductory surgical studies.

D A Hill1, R S Lord.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was conducted to see if student performance in a combined multiple choice and objective structured clinical examination was better following a period of structured clinical teaching compared with traditional bedside teaching. Student groups were crossed over in a second phase of the experiment to allow the two teaching techniques to be compared sequentially in the same group. There was no significant difference between the two teaching techniques as measured by performance in a criterion-referenced examination. The results of the study led to modification of the curriculum for third-year introductory surgical studies to incorporate both teaching strategies, which are regarded as complementary in value.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1758327     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00099.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Rodney Crutcher; Diane Lorenzetti
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Muhammad Tariq; Afaq Motiwala; Syed Umer Ali; Mehmood Riaz; Safia Awan; Jaweed Akhter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  A novel approach to improve undergraduate surgical teaching.

Authors:  R C Baker; R A J Spence; M Boohan; A Dorman; M Stevenson; S J Kirk; K McGlade
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2015-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.