Literature DB >> 17582544

[Evaluation of quality assurance--current data and consequences for research].

M Glattacker1, W H Jäckel.   

Abstract

The number of voluntary and compulsory quality assurance programs has been continuously increasing in all sectors of the healthcare system for many years, on both national and international levels. Based on a current, comprehensive analysis of the literature, however, the evidence of their efficacy and efficiency is limited at this time; even though positive impacts for quality management and quality assurance measures, especially on performance processes, are reported, the impact on outcomes has not been proven or has been insufficiently demonstrated up to now, and the data must be evaluated, overall, as "consistently inconsistent". Based on this evaluation, causes for the lack of evidence and the high variability of the results are first outlined, which are especially inherent in the complexity and heterogeneity of the analyzed interventions. Building on this, the implications for future evaluations of quality management and quality assurance measures are then inferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17582544     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-981460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  4 in total

Review 1.  [The (non)sense of certification in intensive care medicine. The problem of the detection of suitable indicator systems].

Authors:  D A Vagts; M Bauer; J Martin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Quality Assurance Measures and Mortality After Stroke.

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Dijana Ebbeler; Nina Timmesfeld; Manfred Kaps; Klaus Berger; Björn Misselwitz; Christian Günster; Patrik Dröge; Michael Schneider
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Concordance and robustness of quality indicator sets for hospitals: an analysis of routine data.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg; Axel Halim; Robert Färber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.

Authors:  André Strahl; Christian Gerlich; Georg W Alpers; Katja Ehrmann; Jörg Gehrke; Annette Müller-Garnn; Heiner Vogel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.