Literature DB >> 17582457

Evaluating the impacts of membrane type, coating, fouling, chemical properties and water chemistry on reverse osmosis rejection of seven nitrosoalklyamines, including NDMA.

Eva Steinle-Darling1, Marco Zedda, Megan H Plumlee, Harry F Ridgway, Martin Reinhard.   

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) treatment has been found to be effective for a wide range of organics but generally small, polar, uncharged molecules such as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) can be poorly rejected. The rejection of seven N-nitrosoalkylamines with molecular masses in the range of 78-158Da, including NDMA, N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-nitrosomethylethylamine (NMEA), N-nitrosodipropylamine (NDPA), N-nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA), N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPyr), N-nitrosopiperidine (NPip) by three commercial brackish-water reverse osmosis membranes was studied in flat-sheet cells under cross-flow conditions. The membranes used were ESPA3 (Hydranautics), LFC3 (Hydranautics) and BW-30 (Dow/Filmtec), commonly used in water reuse applications. The effects of varying ionic strength and pH, dip-coating membranes with PEBAX 1657, a hydrophilic polymer, and artificial fouling with alginate on nitrosamine rejection were quantified. Rejection in deionized (DI) water increased with molecular mass from 56 to 70% for NDMA, to 80-91% for NMEA, 89-97% for NPyr, 92-98% for NDEA, and to beyond the detection limits for NPip, NDPA and NDBA. For the nitrosamines with quantifiable transmission, linear correlations (r(2)>0.97) were found between the number of methyl groups and the log(transmission), with factor 0.35 to 0.55 decreases in transmission per added methyl group. A PEBAX coating lowered the ESPA3 rejection of NDMA by 11% but increased the LFC3 and BW30 rejection by 6% and 15%, respectively. Artificially fouling ESPA3 membrane coupons with 170g/m(2) alginate decreased the rejection of NDMA by 18%. A feed concentration of 100mM NaCl decreased rejection of NDMA by 15% and acidifying the DI water feed to pH=3 decreased the rejection by 5%, whereas increasing the pH to 10 did not have a significant (p<0.05) effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17582457     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse.

Authors:  David M Warsinger; Sudip Chakraborty; Emily W Tow; Megan H Plumlee; Christopher Bellona; Savvina Loutatidou; Leila Karimi; Anne M Mikelonis; Andrea Achilli; Abbas Ghassemi; Lokesh P Padhye; Shane A Snyder; Stefano Curcio; Chad Vecitis; Hassan A Arafat; John H Lienhard
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 2.  The fate and importance of organics in drinking water treatment: a review.

Authors:  Ivana Ivančev-Tumbas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Living biofouling-resistant membranes as a model for the beneficial use of engineered biofilms.

Authors:  Thammajun L Wood; Rajarshi Guha; Li Tang; Michael Geitner; Manish Kumar; Thomas K Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cellulose Acetate/P4VP-b-PEO Membranes for the Adsorption of Electron-Deficient Pharmaceutical Compounds.

Authors:  Laura Penabad-Peña; Jairo Herrera-Morales; Miguel Betancourt; Eduardo Nicolau
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-12-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.