Literature DB >> 17582454

Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.

A K Graves1, C Hagedorn, A Brooks, R L Hagedorn, E Martin.   

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA), frequency of sampling, and seasonality were evaluated in a rural Virginia watershed dominated by cattle. The selected watershed (Mill Creek) was 3767 ha in size, included two small communities (one sewered and one unsewered), and several farms that when combined contained over 3800 beef and dairy cattle. Monthly monitoring of fecal coliforms at two sampling sites in Mill Creek from January to December, 2001, revealed that the recreational standard (1000 colony forming units, CFUs/100 ml) was exceeded a total of eight times for a 33% violation rate at each site. In addition, stream samples were collected weekly for 4 consecutive weeks during seasonal high flows (March) and seasonal low flows (September-October), plus daily for 7 consecutive days within the weekly schedules for a combined total of 60 stream samples (30 at each of two sites). The recreational standard was exceeded once during seasonal high flow and nine times during seasonal low flow. Microbial source tracking (MST) was performed by ARA to assess the impact of cattle on water quality within the different sampling routines. The resistance patterns of 2880 water isolates and 1158 known source (host-origin) isolates were determined with seven antibiotics at 28 different concentrations. The 1158 isolate database was reduced to 562 unique isolates when clonal ARA patterns were removed. This database of 562 unique isolates had an average rate of correct classification (ARCC) of 95.4%, and several statistical procedures confirmed the library as accurate and representative. Sixty-five percent of 50 challenge-set isolates from sources, but not samples, used in the library were correctly identified. The 562 unique pattern database was used to classify Escherichia coli isolates from water samples into six host source categories. The ARA results showed that cattle were the major source of pollution in the stream and cattle were the dominant source in over 60% of the water samples. Sampling frequency and seasonality had no effect on the MST results, as cattle dominated both seasons and samplings. Deer were a minor contributor in the summer (high water demand), and geese were a minor contributor in the winter when migratory flocks were observed moving through the watershed. An unexpected human allocation was found, especially under seasonal high flow conditions. The exact origin of this human allocation is not known. This project demonstrated that a host-origin library, based on a phenotypic method, could be developed for a well-defined watershed and was both representative of the sources in the watershed and performed reasonably well against a challenge set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17582454     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from human, livestock, and poultry sources by rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting on the shellfish culture area of East China Sea.

Authors:  Hong-Jia Ma; Ling-Lin Fu; Jian-Rong Li
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Data Acceptance Criteria for Standardized Human-Associated Fecal Source Identification Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods.

Authors:  Orin C Shanks; Catherine A Kelty; Robin Oshiro; Richard A Haugland; Tania Madi; Lauren Brooks; Katharine G Field; Mano Sivaganesan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Portable platform for rapid in-field identification of human fecal pollution in water.

Authors:  Yu Sherry Jiang; Timothy E Riedel; Jessica A Popoola; Barrett R Morrow; Sheng Cai; Andrew D Ellington; Sanchita Bhadra
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from human and animal sources uncovers multiple resistances from human sources.

Authors:  A Mark Ibekwe; Shelton E Murinda; Alexandria K Graves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Geographical variation in antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from stool, cow-dung and drinking water.

Authors:  Krushna Chandra Sahoo; Ashok J Tamhankar; Soumyakanta Sahoo; Priyadarshi Soumyaranjan Sahu; Senia Rosales Klintz; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Pramod K Pandey; Philip H Kass; Michelle L Soupir; Sagor Biswas; Vijay P Singh
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.