Literature DB >> 17581902

Acute cholecystitis: MR findings and differentiation from chronic cholecystitis.

Ersan Altun1, Richard C Semelka, Jorge Elias, Larissa Braga, Vasilis Voultsinos, Jignesh Patel, N Cem Balci, John T Woosley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for differentiation between acute and chronic cholecystitis, with histopathologic analysis as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval with waived informed consent was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Four reviewers blinded to the cholecystitis type but aware that cholecystitis was present retrospectively evaluated MR images for predetermined findings in 32 patients (15 male, 17 female; mean age +/- standard deviation, 55 years +/- 20) with histopathologically proved acute or chronic cholecystitis. The final MR diagnoses and MR findings in both groups were compared with each other and with the histopathologic diagnoses to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging. Chi(2) tests were used to detect differences in MR findings between the acute and chronic cholecystitis groups.
RESULTS: MR imaging sensitivity and specificity for detection of acute cholecystitis were 95% (18 of 19 patients) and 69% (nine of 13 patients), respectively. The sensitivities of increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement were 74% (14 of 19 patients) and 62% (10 of 16 patients), respectively. Both findings had 92% (12 of 13 patients) specificity. Sensitivities of increased wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, and adjacent fat signal intensity changes were 100% (19 of 19 patients), 95% (18 of 19 patients), and 95% (18 of 19 patients), respectively; specificities were 54% (seven of 13 patients), 38% (five of 13 patients), and 54% (seven of 13 patients), respectively. Pericholecystic abscess, intraluminal membranes, and wall irregularity or defect each had 100% (13 of 13 patients) specificity; sensitivities were 11% (two of 19 patients), 26% (five of 19 patients), and 21% (four of 19 patients), respectively. Increased gallbladder wall enhancement (P<.001) and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement (P=.003) were the most significantly different between acute and chronic cholecystitis.
CONCLUSION: Increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement had the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and differentiation of acute and chronic cholecystitis. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17581902     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441060920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

Review 1.  Urgent MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) of acute cholecystitis and related complications: diagnostic role and spectrum of imaging findings.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Anna Ravelli; Chiara Villa; Roberto Bianco
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25

2.  Hepatic abnormal perfusion visible by magnetic resonance imaging in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Zhao-Hua Zhai; Nan-Lin Zeng
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-28

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the pericholecystic hepatic parenchyma for distinguishing acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  Avneesh Gupta; Christina A LeBedis; Jennifer Uyeda; Mohammed M Qureshi; Stephan W Anderson; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-08-31

4.  ACR appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain.

Authors:  Gail M Yarmish; Martin P Smith; Max P Rosen; Mark E Baker; Michael A Blake; Brooks D Cash; Nicole M Hindman; Ihab R Kamel; Harmeet Kaur; Rendon C Nelson; Robert J Piorkowski; Aliya Qayyum; Mark Tulchinsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  What's new in the hot gallbladder: the evolving radiologic diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  James P Nugent; Jessica Li; Emily Pang; Alison Harris
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 6.  Noninvasive Imaging Prior to Biliary Interventions.

Authors:  Roberta Catania; Anil K Dasyam; Frank H Miller; Amir A Borhani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 1.780

7.  Modified subtotal cholecystectomy: results of a laparotomy procedure during the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Elia Pulvirenti; Adriana Toro; Giuseppe Corsale
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Treatment of Gallstone Disease.

Authors:  Carsten Gutt; Simon Schläfer; Frank Lammert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Does preoperative MRCP imaging predict risk for conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Atsushi Kohga; Kenji Suzuki; Takuya Okumura; Kimihiro Yamashita; Jun Isogaki; Akihiro Kawabe; Taizo Kimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Chronically symptomatic patients with undetectable gall bladder on ultrasonography could benefit from early cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stephen D Adams; Simon C Blackburn; Victoria A Adewole; Anies A Mahomed
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.