Literature DB >> 17580338

A stereophotographic study of ankle joint contact area.

Stephen Millington1, Markus Grabner, Ralph Wozelka, Shepard Hurwitz, Jeff Crandall.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the ankle joint contact area under physiological load magnitudes using a stereophotography technique that allows accurate analysis of the entire joint surface without disrupting the joint during loading. Ten cadaveric foot and ankle specimens were loaded to 1000 N in neutral, and 20 degrees dorsiflexion, supination, pronation, and plantarflexion. Photo targets rigidly fixed to each of the bones were imaged in the loaded joint position using a high-resolution stereophotography system. After testing, each ankle was disarticulated and the joint surfaces imaged relative to the photo targets. The photo targets were then used to spatially register the joint surfaces into the loaded joint position; the overlap of the surfaces was used to determine the joint contact area. The mean talo-tibia contact area was greatest in dorsiflexion 7.34 +/- 1.69 cm(2) and was significantly larger than in plantar flexion (p < 0.05), which showed the smallest joint contact area 4.39 +/- 1.41 cm(2). Considering talo-fibula, the maximum contact area was measured in dorsiflexion, 2.02 +/- 0.78 cm(2), and the minimum contact area occurred in pronation, 0.77 +/- 0.49 cm(2), respectively (p < 0.05). The reported stereophotography technique allows measurement of the joint contact area without disrupting the joint during loading. The contact area is larger than previously reported, as the entire joint surface was analyzed. Joint contact extends over both the talar dome and the talar shoulders where osteochondritis dissecans lesions commonly occur. (c) 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580338     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

1.  The effect of incongruity and instability on contact stress directional gradients in human cadaveric ankles.

Authors:  T O McKinley; Y Tochigi; M J Rudert; T D Brown
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  [Malleolar osteotomy--osteotomy as approach].

Authors:  A Barg; G Pagenstert; A Leumann; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The evaluation of artificial talus implant on ankle joint contact characteristics: a finite element study based on four subjects.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Nadr Jomha; Samer Adeeb; Marwan El-Rich; Lindsey Westover
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields after arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: double-blind randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Leendert Blankevoort; Rob J de Haan; Inger N Sierevelt; Duncan E Meuffels; Pieter R N d'Hooghe; Rover Krips; Geert van Damme; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful?

Authors:  C Niek van Dijk; Mikel L Reilingh; Maartje Zengerink; Christiaan J A van Bergen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome. A cadaver study.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Maartje Zengerink; Leendert Blankevoort; Maayke N van Sterkenburg; Jakob van Oldenrijk; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Effects of sustained interstitial fluid pressurization under migrating contact area, and boundary lubrication by synovial fluid, on cartilage friction.

Authors:  M Caligaris; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 8.  The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.