Literature DB >> 17580317

Reflections on science, judgment, and value in evidence-based decision making: a conversation with David Eddy by Sean R. Tunis.

David Eddy.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has increasingly influenced decision making in health policy and patient care. Appropriate use of EBM in decision making requires a clear understanding of the distinct "anatomical" components of all decisions: (1) scientific evidence and (2) judgments applied to that evidence by individuals or organizations. In this interview, Sean Tunis discusses these principles with David Eddy. Tunis has provided leadership at the national level in applying EBM principles to health policy decision making at the Office of Technology Assessment, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and now the Center for Medical Technology Policy. Eddy is cofounder and medical director of Archimedes; he is widely recognized as a seminal contributor to evidence-based medicine, helping shape the initial ideas and applying them to guidelines, coverage policies, and performance measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580317     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  15 in total

1.  Medicare's Coverage With Evidence Development: A Policy-Making Tool in Evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Guidelines: we'll always need them, we sometimes dislike them, and we have to make them better.

Authors:  R Kahn
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Transparency in evidence evaluation and formulary decision-making: from conceptual development to real-world implementation.

Authors:  Bonnie B Dean; Kelly J Ko; Jennifer S Graff; A Russell Localio; Rolin Wade; Robert W Dubois
Journal:  P T       Date:  2013-08

4.  Healthcare rationing by proxy: cost-effectiveness analysis and the misuse of the $50,000 threshold in the US.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South Africa.

Authors:  Jacqui Miot; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Donna Rindress; Mireille M Goetghebeur
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-02-29

6.  Population health, outcomes research, and prevention: example of the American Heart Association 2020 goals.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-01

7.  Measuring Use of Research Evidence: The Structured Interview for Evidence Use.

Authors:  Lawrence A Palinkas; Antonio R Garcia; Gregory A Aarons; Megan Finno-Velasquez; Ian W Holloway; Thomas I Mackie; Laurel K Leslie; Patricia Chamberlain
Journal:  Res Soc Work Pract       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  A comparative analysis of potential spatio-temporal access to palliative care services in two Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Nadine Schuurman; Ofer Amram; Valorie A Crooks; Rory Johnston; Allison Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The policy debate over public investment in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applications.

Authors:  Mireille M Goetghebeur; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Randy J Levitt; Lonny J Erickson; Donna Rindress
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.