Literature DB >> 17580209

The artificial conduit for urinary diversion in rats: a preliminary study.

T Drewa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Small intestinal submucosa forms a scaffold for tubular construction. The aim of this study was to build the artificial conduit using small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and 3T3 fibroblasts for urinary diversion in rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3T3 fibroblasts were multiplied to a total of 10(9). Two groups consisted of three Wistar rats each. The left ureters were separated from the bladder and anastomosed to the proximal end of the tubular scaffold. No splitting of the ureteral junction or drainage was done. The distal end of the scaffold was implanted into a previously performed channel in the abdominal wall. Cell-seeded grafts were used in the first group and acellular SIS scaffolds in the second group. Rats were sacrificed after 2 and 4 weeks. X-ray pyelography was performed. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was prepared from conduit cross sections.
RESULTS: All animals survived the observation. An inflammatory reaction was observed within the peritoneal cavity in both groups. It was difficult to dissect the adhesions in the cell-seeded group. The ureteral-conduit anastomoses were tight in five cases, except there was leakage and pseudocyst formation after 14 days in one cell-seeded graft. No ureterohydronephrosis was observed in two acellular conduits after 14 or 30 days, and in one case of a cell-seeded graft. A neovascularisation process was observed in the acellular conduit after a month. Multilayered epithelium covered the conduit lumen near the anastomosis at the distal end of acellular conduit, a small islet-forming epithelial layer was observed after a month.
CONCLUSIONS: 3T3 fibroblasts cannot serve as a "feeder layer" for ureteral augmentation. It seems that there is no need to split the ureteral-conduit junction. An SIS scaffold was used for tubular construction for urinary diversion in an animal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580209     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tissue-engineered urinary conduits.

Authors:  Max Kates; Anirudha Singh; Hotaka Matsui; Gary D Steinberg; Norm D Smith; Mark P Schoenberg; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Tissue engineering for the oncologic urinary bladder.

Authors:  Tomasz Drewa; Jan Adamowicz; Arun Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Urine-derived stem cells for potential use in bladder repair.

Authors:  Danian Qin; Ting Long; Junhong Deng; Yuanyuan Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) as a Suitable Scaffold for the Creation of a Tissue-Engineered Urinary Conduit: Decellularization, Biomechanical and Biocompatibility Characterization Using New Approaches.

Authors:  Martina Casarin; Tiago Moderno Fortunato; Saima Imran; Martina Todesco; Deborah Sandrin; Giulia Borile; Ilaria Toniolo; Massimo Marchesan; Gino Gerosa; Andrea Bagno; Filippo Romanato; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Alessandro Morlacco; Fabrizio Dal Moro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in Pediatric Urology: Urethral and Urinary Bladder Reconstruction.

Authors:  Martina Casarin; Alessandro Morlacco; Fabrizio Dal Moro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Bioengineering solutions for ureteric disorders: clinical need, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kapetanos; Alexander Light; Niyukta Thakare; Krishnaa Mahbubani; Kasra Saeb-Parsy; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 7.  Artificial urinary conduit construction using tissue engineering methods.

Authors:  Tomasz Kloskowski; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 8.  Tissue engineering in animal models for urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Rob de Vries; Paul Geutjes; Joanna IntHout; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout Feitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ureter regeneration-the proper scaffold has to be defined.

Authors:  Tomasz Kloskowski; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Tomasz Kowalczyk; Maciej Nowacki; Magdalena Bodnar; Andrzej Marszałek; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Małgorzata Frontczak-Baniewicz; Tomasz A Kowalewski; Piotr Chłosta; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Concise Review: Tissue Engineering of Urinary Bladder; We Still Have a Long Way to Go?

Authors:  Jan Adamowicz; Marta Pokrywczynska; Shane Vontelin Van Breda; Tomasz Kloskowski; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.940

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.