Literature DB >> 17580144

Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not?

R Ruszat1, S F Wyler, T Wolff, T Forster, C Lenggenhager, M Dickenmann, T Eugster, L Gürke, J Steiger, T C Gasser, T Sulser, A Bachmann.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We retrospectively compared perioperative donor outcomes and early complication rate of right- and left-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (RLDN).
METHODS: From November 2001 to April 2006, we performed 118 RLDN. Including 24% (n = 28) right-sided RLDN and 76% (n = 90) left-sided RLDN. Perioperative results and the rate of adverse events were compared for both sides.
RESULTS: We observed no significant difference in operation time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, or postoperative creatinine levels between right- and left-sided kidney donors. RLDN was successfully performed in 116 of 118 donors. One donor in each group had to be converted to an open approach. We observed one graft loss due to renal artery kinking in one recipient after left-sided RLDN. Two right donations needed a saphenous venous patch due to a short right renal vein (<2 cm). Overall, intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable between the two donor groups.
CONCLUSION: Right-sided RLDN provides comparable perioperative and postoperative results to those of left-sided RLDN. Our results demonstrated that groups with significant experience in RLDN can perform right living donor nephrectomy safely and efficiently with minimal invasiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580144     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  7 in total

1.  [Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery. Indications, technique, and results after 360 procedures].

Authors:  S Wyler; A Bachmann; B Weltzien; T Gasser; R Ruszat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Right versus left retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Toshiaki Kashiwadate; Kazuaki Tokodai; Noritoshi Amada; Izumi Haga; Tetsuro Takayama; Atsushi Nakamura; Takuya Jimbo; Yasuyuki Hara; Naoki Kawagishi; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Maximizing the donor pool: left versus right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nian Liu; Romel Wazir; Jia Wang; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L Broudeur; G Karam; I Chelghaf; S De Vergie; J Rigaud; M A Perrouin Verbe; Julien Branchereau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Complications of retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: single center experience after 164 cases.

Authors:  Alexander Bachmann; Stephen Wyler; Thomas Wolff; Lorenz Gürke; Jürg Steiger; Christoph Kettelhack; Thomas C Gasser; Robin Ruszat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Impact of right-sided nephrectomy on long-term outcomes in retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy at single center.

Authors:  Kazuya Omoto; Taiji Nozaki; Masashi Inui; Tomokazu Shimizu; Toshihito Hirai; Yugo Sawada; Hideki Ishida; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-10-21

7.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic left versus right live donor nephrectomy: Comparison of outcomes.

Authors:  Shrinivas Rudrapatna Pandarinath; Babulal Choudhary; Harvinder Singh Chouhan; Shivashankar Rudramani; Deepak Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.