Literature DB >> 17579934

Effective early warning systems for new and emerging health technologies: developing an evaluation framework and an assessment of current systems.

Kieran Murphy1, Claire Packer, Andrew Stevens, Sue Simpson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define an effective early warning system, to identify and rank the characteristics of an effective early warning system for emerging health technologies, and to evaluate current early warning systems against these characteristics.
METHODS: An iterative Delphi-type process with the thirteen members of the International Information Network on New and Changing Health Technologies (EuroScan). We synthesized key characteristics that network members had graded. Members were then asked whether these characteristics were present or fulfilled in their system.
RESULTS: The definition of an effective early warning system developed was the following: a system that identifies innovations in the field of health technology likely to have a significant impact; and disseminates information relevant to the needs of the customer which is timely, so as to enable appropriate decision making (such as resource allocation), facilitate appropriate adoption, and identify further research requirements. Five primary and eleven secondary components of effective early warning systems were identified. The five primary characteristics concerned relevance, independence, resourcing, a clear pathway for the outputs to reach decision makers, and defined customers. Although the primary characteristics were present or fulfilled to some extent in the majority of evaluated early warning systems, there was considerable variability in the presence of the secondary characteristics in the evaluated systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a definition for an effective early warning system and a shared understanding of the important characteristics and components of such systems. This work should provide guidance to those setting up new early warning systems as well as for those managing and reviewing current systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17579934     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462307070493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  6 in total

1.  The Italian Horizon Scanning Project.

Authors:  Roberta Joppi; Luca Demattè; Anna Michela Menti; Daniela Pase; Chiara Poggiani; Luigi Mezzalira
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A method for addressing research gaps in HTA, developed whilst evaluating robotic-assisted surgery: a proposal.

Authors:  Luciana Ballini; Silvia Minozzi; Antonella Negro; Giampiero Pirini; Roberto Grilli
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-09-20

3.  Forecasting drug utilization and expenditure in a metropolitan health region.

Authors:  Björn Wettermark; Marie E Persson; Nils Wilking; Mats Kalin; Seher Korkmaz; Paul Hjemdahl; Brian Godman; Max Petzold; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  EUROSCAN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK MEMBER AGENCIES: THEIR STRUCTURE, PROCESSES, AND OUTPUTS.

Authors:  Claire Packer; Sue Simpson; Rosimary Terezinha de Almeida
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  The role of health technology assessment bodies in shaping drug development.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Did we see it Coming? An Evaluation of the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System.

Authors:  Irene Eriksson; Mia von Euler; Rickard E Malmström; Brian Godman; Björn Wettermark
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.561

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.