Literature DB >> 17579933

Health technology assessment and ill-structured problems: a case study concerning the drug mebeverine.

Margriet Moret-Hartman1, Gert Jan van der Wilt, John Grin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The practical significance of health technology assessment (HTA) in policy decisions or clinical practice has been challenged. Possibly, problem definitions underlying HTA do not concur sufficiently with the problem definitions held by policy makers or clinicians. We performed an in-depth case study on mebeverine, a drug prescribed to patients with irritable bowel syndrome, to explore this hypothesis.
METHODS: The theoretical framework was provided by the theory of argumentative policy analysis. We analyzed documents and held semistructured interviews to collect data. We reconstructed interpretative frames to analyze actors' argumentation.
RESULTS: The funding and usage problems relating to mebeverine were ill-structured. Actors disagreed on the information needed and the norms at stake. As a result, the problem definition shifted, and the resulting problem definitions failed to correspond with the problems perceived by the target populations.
CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that future studies on healthcare problems are useful, it is imperative that policy makers take the problem definitions of potential users into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17579933     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462307070481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  1 in total

1.  Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Ken Bond; Lars Sandman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.431

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.