Literature DB >> 17577353

Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens.

Anthony Teik-Jin Goon1, Magnus Bruze, Erik Zimerson, Chee-Leok Goh, Marléne Isaksson.   

Abstract

In a recent study we showed that all our dental personnel/patients were detected with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) and 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (bis-GMA). We studied 90 patients tested to the acrylate and nail acrylics series at our department over a 10 year period to see whether screening allergens could be found. Patch testing with an acrylate and nail acrylics series was performed. Among the 10 acrylate/methacrylate-allergic occupational dermatitis patients tested to the acrylate series, the most common allergens were triethyleneglycol diacrylate (TREGDA, 8), diethyleneglycol diacrylate (5), and 1,4-butanediol diacrylate (BUDA, 5). All 10 of these patients would have been picked up by a short screening series combining TREGDA, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA), and BUDA or 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA). Among the 14 acrylate/methacrylate-allergic nail patients, the most common allergens were ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA, 11), 2-HEMA, (9), and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (9). Screening for 3 allergens i.e. 2-HEMA plus EGDMA plus TREGDA, would have detected all 14 nail patients. A short screening series combining 2-HEMA, EGDMA, TREGDA, 2-HPMA, bis-GMA, and BUDA or HDDA would have picked up all our past study patients (dental, industrial, and nail) with suspected allergy to acrylate/methacrylate allergens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17577353     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01151.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of methods of high-pressure freezing and automated freeze-substitution of suspension cells combined with LR White embedding.

Authors:  Margarita Sobol; Vlada V Philimonenko; Pavel Hozák
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  A method for preserving ultrastructural properties of mitotic cells for subsequent immunogold labeling using low-temperature embedding in LR White resin.

Authors:  Margarita Sobol; Jana Nebesářová; Pavel Hozák
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Resin monomers act as adjuvants in Ni-induced allergic dermatitis in vivo.

Authors:  K Bando; H Takahashi; M Kinbara; Y Tanaka; T Kuroishi; K Sasaki; T Takano-Yamamoto; S Sugawara; Y Endo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Bilateral Eyelid Contact Dermatitis and Toxic Conjunctivitis due to Acrylate-Containing Glue.

Authors:  Yong Joon Kim; Jin Kwon Chung
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.444

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.