Literature DB >> 17576997

How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Mary B Barton1, Therese Miller, Tracy Wolff, Diana Petitti, Michael LeFevre, George Sawaya, Barbara Yawn, Janelle Guirguis-Blake, Ned Calonge, Russell Harris.   

Abstract

Since 2001, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has worked to refine its methods of evidence review and assessment and to create more usable documents in response to clinicians' needs. These changes have resulted in a revised grading system, as well as a new format and new language for the recommendation statement. This paper focuses on the changes to and the new look of the USPSTF recommendation statement. The new recommendation statement comprises 9 sections. Important changes include standardization of the format of the summary statement to specify what service is being recommended in what population; standardization of the headings in the rationale section; a change in the wording of the grade C recommendation and the I statement; and a new section, called "Other Considerations," in which salient issues related to cost-effectiveness, mandates, and other implementation issues are described.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576997     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

Review 1.  Could media reports include a standardized scale for quality of evidence?

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A guide to the Canadian Medical Association handbook on clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Valerie A Palda; Dave Davis; Joanne Goldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A multifaceted knowledge translation strategy can increase compliance with guideline recommendations for mechanical bowel preparation.

Authors:  Cagla Eskicioglu; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Are current scoliosis school screening recommendations evidence-based and up to date? A best evidence synthesis umbrella review.

Authors:  Maciej Płaszewski; Josette Bettany-Saltikov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reducing Health Disparities Through Prevention: Role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Kate A Kirley; Ronald T Ackermann
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Biopsy of soft tissue masses: evidence-based medicine for the musculoskeletal tumor society.

Authors:  Bruce T Rougraff; Albert Aboulafia; J Sybil Biermann; John Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Recent advances in pediatric dialysis: a review of selected articles.

Authors:  John D Mahan; Hiren P Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  A framework for crafting clinical practice guidelines that are relevant to the care and management of people with multimorbidity.

Authors:  Katrin Uhlig; Bruce Leff; David Kent; Sydney Dy; Klara Brunnhuber; Jako S Burgers; Sheldon Greenfield; Gordon Guyatt; Kevin High; Rosanne Leipzig; Cynthia Mulrow; Kenneth Schmader; Holger Schunemann; Louise C Walter; James Woodcock; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.