Literature DB >> 17575656

Screening for breast cancer: current recommendations and future directions.

Doug Knutson1, Elizabeth Steiner.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most significant health concerns in the United States. Recent reviews have questioned the value of traditional breast cancer screening methods. Breast self-examination has been shown not to improve cancer-specific or all-cause mortality in large studies, but it is commonly advocated as a noninvasive screen. Patients who choose to perform self-examination should be trained in appropriate technique and follow-up. The contribution of the clinical breast examination to early detection is difficult to determine, but studies show that sensitivity is highly dependent on time taken to do the examination. Up to 10 percent of cancers are mammographically silent but evident on clinical breast examination. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammography for women older than 40 years who are in good health, but physicians should consider that sensitivity is lower for younger women. Digital mammography is somewhat more sensitive in younger women and women with dense breasts, but outcome studies are lacking. Although magnetic resonance imaging shows promise as a screening tool in some high-risk women, it is not currently recommended for general screening because of high false-positive rates and cost. The American Cancer Society recommends annual magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to screening mammography in high-risk women 30 years and older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  7 in total

1.  Why do breast cancer patients report late or abscond during treatment in ghana? A pilot study.

Authors:  J Clegg-Lamptey; J Dakubo; Y N Attobra
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-09

2.  Effects of a smartphone application on breast self-examination: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jaesung Heo; Mison Chun; Ki Young Lee; Young-Taek Oh; O Kyu Noh; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2013-12-31

3.  The quality of preventive health care delivered to adults: results from a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Benedetto Manuti; Paolo Rizza; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Array-based multiplex analysis of DNA methylation in breast cancer tissues.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Melnikov; Denise M Scholtens; Elizabeth L Wiley; Seema A Khan; Victor V Levenson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Measurement of the knowledge level about breast self-exam among the female employees of a university hospital, Turkey.

Authors:  Hamide Şişman; Refiye Özgen; Dudu Baysal; Nuriye Sarıakçalı; Sibel Öztürk; Pınar Kum; Derya Gürel; Derya Kanarığ; Evren Aslaner; Yasemin Akıl; Meral Günaldı
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

6.  A hospital based survey to evaluate knowledge, awareness and perceived barriers regarding breast cancer screening among females in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Nurul Amin; Md Giash Uddin; Md Nazim Uddin; Md Zahedur Rahaman; Shafayet Ahmed Siddiqui; Md Shahadat Hossain; Md Rakibul Islam; Md Nazmul Hasan; S M Naim Uddin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-04-10

7.  Time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in Latina and non-Hispanic white women: the six cities study.

Authors:  Amelie G Ramirez; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Gregory A Talavera; Frank J Penedo; J Emilio Carrillo; Maria E Fernandez; Edgar Muñoz; Dorothy Long Parma; Alan Ec Holden; Sandra San Miguel de Majors; Anna Nápoles; Sheila F Castañeda; Kipling J Gallion
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.