Literature DB >> 17575242

Nucleotide excision repair pathway genes and oral premalignant lesions.

Yunfei Wang1, Margaret R Spitz, J Jack Lee, Maosheng Huang, Scott M Lippman, Xifeng Wu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral premalignant lesions (OPL) are associated with tobacco exposure and an increase in risk of oral cancer. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways involved in the removal of tobacco carcinogen adducts. Polymorphisms in NER genes may cause variations in DNA repair capacity and increase susceptibility to both premalignant lesions and cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In this case-control study of 144 OPL patients and 288 controls, we genotyped 11 polymorphisms in 8 major NER genes, including XPA [A23G at 5' untranslated region (UTR)], XPD (Asp312Asn, Lys751Gln), XPC (Ala499Val, Lys939Gln), XPG (His1104Asp), XPF (Pro662Ser), ERCC6 (Met1097Val, Arg1230Pro) Rad23B (Ala249Val), and CCNH (Val270Ala).
RESULTS: We found significant or borderline-significant associations between OPL risk and the polymorphisms XPA (A23G), XPD (Lys751Gln), XPC (Ala499Val), Rad23B (Ala249Val), and XPD (Asp312Asn), with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of 1.97 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.27-3.06], 1.60 (95% CI, 1.02-2.51), 0.63 (95% CI, 0.40-1.00), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.41-1.07), and 1.42 (95% CI, 0.90-2.23), respectively. When further stratified analyses were done, the decreased risk conferred by the XPC (Ala499Val) variant allele was more evident in older individuals (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.03), in women (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.01), in ever smokers (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05), and in never drinkers (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-1.00). Finally, we found joint effects between these NER gene variants and smoking status. For example, when never smokers with the XPA 23A genotypes were used as the reference group, the ORs for never smokers with the XPA 23G genotype, smokers with the 23A genotype, and smokers with 23G genotypes were 2.19 (1.07-4.46), 2.64 (1.42-4.89), and 5.04 (2.62-9.69), respectively. Gene-gene and gene-smoking interaction for OPLs risk were also confirmed by multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis in our study. MDR analysis revealed that a model containing ever smoking, XPA (A23G), XPC (Ala499Val), and XPD (Asp312Asn) was the best model to predict OPL risk with maximum average cross-validation consistency and minimum prediction error (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that polymorphisms in NER genes may contribute to genetic susceptibility to OPLs and may therefore contribute to the development of oral cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575242     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  31 in total

1.  Genetic variation in radiation and platinum pathways predicts severe acute radiation toxicity in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with cisplatin-based preoperative radiochemotherapy: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  H H Yoon; P Catalano; M K Gibson; T C Skaar; S Philips; E A Montgomery; M J Hafez; M Powell; G Liu; A A Forastiere; A B Benson; L R Kleinberg; K M Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism is not associated with oral cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Cui; Dalu Li; Liang Shen; Wenmei Zhang; Xin Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-22

3.  Predictive impact of genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes on susceptibility and therapeutic outcomes to colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Aixia Gong; Pin Liang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-30

4.  XPF expression correlates with clinical outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Alec Vaezi; Xiaozhe Wang; Shama Buch; William Gooding; Lin Wang; Raja R Seethala; David T Weaver; Alan D D'Andrea; Athanassios Argiris; Marjorie Romkes; Laura J Niedernhofer; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Polymorphisms in DNA damage response genes and head and neck cancer risk.

Authors:  Rafael E Flores-Obando; Susanne M Gollin; Camille C Ragin
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Association study of genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes and risk of basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Lin; Harvind S Chahal; Wenting Wu; Hyunje G Cho; Katherine J Ransohoff; Fengju Song; Jean Y Tang; Kavita Y Sarin; Jiali Han
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Molecular techniques and genetic alterations in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick K Ha; Steven S Chang; Chad A Glazer; Joseph A Califano; David Sidransky
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Variants in nucleotide excision repair core genes and susceptibility to recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Authors:  Xicheng Song; Erich M Sturgis; Lei Jin; Zhongqiu Wang; Qingyi Wei; Guojun Li
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Genetic polymorphisms in double-strand break DNA repair genes associated with risk of oral premalignant lesions.

Authors:  Hushan Yang; Scott M Lippman; Maosheng Huang; J Jack Lee; Wei Wang; Margaret R Spitz; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer: the role of the nucleotide excision repair pathway.

Authors:  Jennifer Pan; Jie Lin; Julie G Izzo; Yang Liu; Jinliang Xing; Maosheng Huang; Jaffer A Ajani; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.