Literature DB >> 17575231

Dose-escalating and pharmacologic study of oxaliplatin in adult cancer patients with impaired hepatic function: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study.

Timothy W Synold1, Chris H Takimoto, James H Doroshow, David Gandara, Sridhar Mani, Scot C Remick, Daniel L Mulkerin, Anne Hamilton, Sunil Sharma, Ramesh K Ramanathan, Heinz Josef Lenz, Martin Graham, Jeffrey Longmate, Bennett M Kaufman, Percy Ivy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and maximally tolerated doses of oxaliplatin in patients with hepatic impairment and to develop formal guidelines for oxaliplatin dosing in this patient population. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Sixty adult cancer patients with variable hepatic function received i.v. oxaliplatin ranging from 60 to 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by levels of total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) into five cohorts based on the degree of hepatic dysfunction: control group A [bilirubin, AST, and AP < or = upper limit of normal (ULN)], mild dysfunction group B (bilirubin < or = ULN, ULN < AST < or = 2.5 x ULN, or ULN < AP < or = 5 x ULN), moderate dysfunction group C (ULN < bilirubin < or = 3.0 mg/dL, AST > 2.5 x ULN, or AP > 5 x ULN), severe dysfunction group D (bilirubin > 3.0 mg/dL, any AST, and any AP), and liver transplantation group E (any bilirubin, any AST, and any AP). Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients, and urine and plasma ultrafiltrates were assayed for platinum concentrations.
RESULTS: Dose escalation of single-agent oxaliplatin to 130 mg/m(2) was well tolerated in all cohorts. Platinum clearance did not correlate with any liver function test. Two of 56 assessable patients with a diagnosis of laryngeal carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma experienced partial responses lasting 3 and 5.5 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was well tolerated in all patients with impaired liver function. Dose reductions of single-agent oxaliplatin are not indicated in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575231     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Successful and well-tolerated second line therapy with cetuximab, irinotecan, and raltitrexed in progressive liver disease due to metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  F Geurs; S Vandewaeter; S Ponette; J Ponette; S Knape; P Demetter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2009-05-06

2.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin 3-hour infusion every three weeks in patients with advanced cancer and alteration of hepatic function.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardo; Ramón Salazar; Eva Ciruelos; Hernán Cortés-Funes; Margarita García; Margarita Majem; Ana Montes; Carmen Cuadra; Arturo Soto-Matos; Claudia Lebedinsky; Vicente Alfaro; Luis Paz-Ares
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma pre-treated with sorafenib.

Authors:  Olivier Mir; Romain Coriat; Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette; Stanislas Ropert; Jean-Philippe Durand; Anatole Cessot; Vincent Mallet; Philippe Sogni; Stanislas Chaussade; Stanislas Pol; François Goldwasser
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Chemotherapy in patients with hepatobiliary cancers and abnormal hepatic function.

Authors:  Jun Gong; May Cho; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-04

5.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of liver dysfunction: phase I NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study NCI-6432.

Authors:  Patricia M LoRusso; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Ramesh K Ramanathan; John Sarantopoulos; Daniel Mulkerin; Stephen I Shibata; Anne Hamilton; Afshin Dowlati; Sridhar Mani; Michelle A Rudek; Chris H Takimoto; Rachel Neuwirth; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Percy Ivy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Phase II Study of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Cetuximab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hanna K Sanoff; Stephen Bernard; Richard M Goldberg; Michael A Morse; Reynaldo Garcia; Lynna Woods; Dominic T Moore; Bert H O'Neil
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05

7.  Risks and benefits of phase I liver dysfunction studies: should patients with severe liver dysfunction be included in these trials?

Authors:  Christos Fountzilas; Selena Stuart; Brian Hernandez; Elizabeth Bowhay-Carnes; Joel Michalek; John Sarantopoulos; Anand Karnad; Sukeshi Patel; Steven Weitman; Devalingam Mahalingam
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  A phase I trial of oxaliplatin in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Syma Iqbal; Heinz-Josef Lenz; David R Gandara; Stephen I Shibata; Susan Groshen; Timothy W Synold; Edward M Newman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of anti-angiogenic therapies.

Authors:  Anna Patrikidou; Isabelle Sinapi; Hélène Regnault; Florence Fayard; Mohamed Bouattour; Laetitia Fartoux; Sandrine Faivre; David Malka; Michel Ducreux; Valerie Boige
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Outcomes in Phase I Clinical Trials in Cancer Subjects.

Authors:  Aaron S Mansfield; Michelle A Rudek; Diana Vulih; Gary L Smith; Pamela Jo Harris; S Percy Ivy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.