Literature DB >> 17575176

Relationship between body weight and beak characteristics in one-day-old white Leghorn chicks: its implications for beak trimming.

A G Fahey1, R M Marchant-Forde, H W Cheng.   

Abstract

Beak trimming is a routine practice used in laying hens to prevent feather pecking and cannibalism. The effect of beak trimming on bird well-being depends on multiple factors, including the amount of beak that is trimmed and the quality of the procedure. The aim of this work was to determine if a relationship existed between BW and beak characteristics in 1-d-old chicks, with a future aim to develop an automated system for standardizing beak trimming. Three hundred forty-four 1-d-old chicks (Hy-Line W-36) were sorted into 3 categories based on their BW (heavy, intermediate, and light), and their beaks were photographed. Dimensional measures of beaks, including the lengths of the culmen, gonys, maxillary tomia, mandibular tomia, and the width of the upper mandible and lower mandible measured at 2, 3, and 4 mm from the tip of the upper and lower beaks, were calculated using imaging software. Correlations between BW and beak measures were evaluated using Pearson product-moment, Spearman rank-order, Kendall's tau, and Hoeffding's dependency tests. Results showed there were no significant correlations between beak dimensions and BW in the light BW group. In contrast, correlations were present between BW and the width of the upper mandible measured at 4 mm from the tip of the upper beak (P < 0.05) and the width of the lower mandible measured 2 to 4 mm from the tip of the lower beak (P < 0.05) in the intermediate BW group. In the heavy BW group, BW was positively correlated with mandibular tomia, gonys, and the width of the lower mandible measured at 2 mm from the tip of the lower beak (P < 0.05). However, in general, these correlations were too low (all below 0.23) to have any practical use for predicting beak size. Overall, the data indicated that BW cannot be used as a reliable predicator of beak size in 1-d-old Hy-Line W-36 chicks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575176     DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.7.1312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  4 in total

1.  The influence of different beak trimming age on performance, H-L ratio and antibody production to SRBC in laying hens.

Authors:  E Ebru Onbaşilar; Sahnur E Demirtaş; Züleyha Kahraman; Ender Karademir; Sunay Demir
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Characterization of the Th profile of the bovine endometrium during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy.

Authors:  Lilian J Oliveira; Nadéra Mansouri-Attia; Nadéra Mansourri-Attia; Alan G Fahey; John Browne; Niamh Forde; James F Roche; Patrick Lonergan; Trudee Fair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Can Non-Beak Treated Hens be Kept in Commercial Furnished Cages? Exploring the Effects of Strain and Extra Environmental Enrichment on Behaviour, Feather Cover, and Mortality.

Authors:  Krysta L H Morrissey; Sarah Brocklehurst; Laurence Baker; Tina M Widowski; Victoria Sandilands
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  An analysis of beak shape variation in two ages of domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using landmark-based geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Hillary A Dalton; Benjamin J Wood; Tina M Widowski; Michele T Guerin; Stephanie Torrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.