Literature DB >> 17574759

Shortened cortical silent period in facial muscles of patients with migraine.

Antonio Curra1, Francesco Pierelli, Gianluca Coppola, Piero Barbanti, Maria Gabriella Buzzi, Francesca Galeotti, Mariano Serrao, Andrea Truini, Carlo Casali, Flavia Pauri, Giorgio Cruccu.   

Abstract

Despite intensive neurophysiological research, evidence is lacking to show whether abnormal cortical excitability in migraine reflects a primary cortical disturbance or reduced control by thalamo-cortical loops. One way to contribute to the scientific discussion on this topic is to deliver transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and test the cortical silent period (SP) recorded in facial muscles. The facial-muscle SP is a purely cortical phenomenon that reflects the excitability of inhibitory interneurons, and can disclose changes in cortical inhibition even in patients without documented primary lesions of the motor cortices. To test the interictal excitability of cortical motor inhibitory interneurons in migraine, we investigated the facial-SP in patients with migraine with and without aura between attacks. In 26 patients and 15 age-matched controls, high-intensity magnetic stimuli were delivered with a round coil centered at the vertex during a maximal muscle contraction. Electromyographic responses were recorded from surface electrodes placed over the subjects' perioral muscles. Facial SPs were significantly shorter in patients than in controls. The SP shortening provides neurophysiological evidence showing hypoexcitability of cortical inhibitory neurons in patients with migraine between attacks. Despite a possible primary deficit of cortical inhibitory interneurons in migraine, we favor the interpretation of a secondary disfacilitation by hypoactive thalamo-cortical loops. Based on this interpretation, the interictal reduced cortical inhibition documented by the shortened SP could be considered the motor counterpart of the reduced preactivation excitability level in the sensory cortices purported to explain why cortical evoked responses habituate poorly in patients with migraine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574759     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Does habituation depend on cortical inhibition? Results of an rTMS study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  A Palermo; G Giglia; S Vigneri; G Cosentino; B Fierro; F Brighina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Cortical excitability and neurology: insights into the pathophysiology.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Tobias Loetscher; Richard A L Macdonell; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

3.  Direct optic nerve pulvinar connections defined by diffusion MR tractography in humans: implications for photophobia.

Authors:  Nasim Maleki; Lino Becerra; Jaymin Upadhyay; Rami Burstein; David Borsook
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex on laser-evoked potentials in migraine.

Authors:  Marina de Tommaso; Filippo Brighina; Brigida Fierro; Vito Devito Francesco; Roberto Santostasi; Vittorio Sciruicchio; Eleonora Vecchio; Claudia Serpino; Paolo Lamberti; Paolo Livrea
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Reduced cerebellar inhibition in migraine with aura: a TMS study.

Authors:  Filippo Brighina; Antonio Palermo; Maristella L Panetta; Ornella Daniele; Antonina Aloisio; Giuseppe Cosentino; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Understanding intracortical excitability in phantom limb pain: A multivariate analysis from a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paulo E P Teixeira; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Muhammed Enes Gunduz; Anna Carolyna Gianlorenço; Luis Castelo-Branco; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 7.  Analgesic Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kun-Long Zhang; Hua Yuan; Fei-Fei Wu; Xue-Yin Pu; Bo-Zhi Liu; Ze Li; Kai-Feng Li; Hui Liu; Yi Yang; Ya-Yun Wang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-03-22

8.  Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cosentino; Salvatore Di Marco; Salvatore Ferlisi; Francesca Valentino; Walter M Capitano; Brigida Fierro; Filippo Brighina
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 9.  Cortical inhibition and habituation to evoked potentials: relevance for pathophysiology of migraine.

Authors:  Filippo Brighina; Antonio Palermo; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Corticospinal excitability as a biomarker of myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Aurore Thibaut; Dian Zeng; Wolnei Caumo; Jianhua Liu; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-04-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.