Literature DB >> 17574073

The relationship between histology and outcome in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer patients participating in first-line chemotherapy trials: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

D Scott McMeekin1, Virginia L Filiaci, J Tate Thigpen, Holly H Gallion, Gini F Fleming, William H Rodgers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore associations between histology and outcome in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients participating in Gynecologic Oncology Group chemotherapy trials.
METHODS: Age, race, performance status, histologic type (serous=S; clear cell=CC; endometrioid=E), disease stage, and prior radiation were evaluated using various analytic methods to evaluate the probability of response and identify independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Single agent or combination chemotherapy regimens including doxorubicin (A) (12%), doxorubicin/cisplatin (AP) (63%), doxorubicin/paclitaxel (AT) (13%), and paclitaxel/doxorubicin/cisplatin (TAP) (11%) were used among 1203 patients treated on 4 randomized clinical trials. Breakdown of disease stage was 7.8% stage III, 22.8% stage IV, and 69.4% recurrent disease. Histologic distribution was 18% S, 3.7% CC, 8.5% mixed, 51.7% E and 18.1% other. More S/CC patients enrolled on trials with advanced stage (III-IV) disease (as opposed to recurrent disease) compared to E patients (45% vs. 24%, p<0.05). Overall response rate was 42% (E=44%, S=44%, CC=32%). Histologic type was not an independent predictor of response. Independent predictors of PFS included race, performance status, disease stage, and CC histology. Histology was also an independent predictor of OS; the relative hazard ratio for S histology was 1.2 (1.02-1.4; p=0.03), and for CC was 1.51 (1.1-2.07; p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer treated with A, P and/or T, response was not associated with histology. This exploratory analysis does not support exclusion of S tumors in future trials. Poorer PFS and OS were observed in CC compared to other types, but a lack of benefit from chemotherapy was not shown, and as this histology represents such a small fraction, it does not seem feasible to have separate chemotherapy trials for CC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574073     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  34 in total

Review 1.  Improving oncologic outcomes for women with endometrial cancer: realigning our sights.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Pulmonary fibrosis after pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in a patient with uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole S Nevadunsky; Chinyere Mbagwu; Nina Mizrahi; Elizabeth Burton; Gary L Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Immunotherapy: Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lynch-Associated Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  J Stuart Ferriss; M Yvette Williams-Brown
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-08-23

Review 4.  Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in Adjuvant and Advanced Disease Settings.

Authors:  Christine M Bestvina; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-13

5.  Comparison of outcomes in early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma and serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Minsi Zhang; T Jonathan Yang; Neil B Desai; Deborah DeLair; Marisa A Kollmeier; Vicky Makker; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Hematogenous metastases in patients with Stage I or II endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Paweł Blecharz; Krzysztof Urbański; Anna Mucha-Małecka; Krzysztof Małecki; Marian Reinfuss; Jerzy Jakubowicz; Piotr Skotnicki
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Promising novel therapies for the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Paola A Gehrig; Victoria L Bae-Jump
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  The clinicopathologic significance of p53 and BAF-250a (ARID1A) expression in clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Katja Gwin; Mohamed M Desouki; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Jones; Dineo Khabele; Sharon X Liang; Wenxin Zheng; Khaled Mohammed; Jonathan L Hecht; Vinita Parkash
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  An exploratory analysis of HER-2 amplification and overexpression in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  T A Grushko; V L Filiaci; A J Mundt; K Ridderstråle; O I Olopade; G F Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: state of the state.

Authors:  R Wendel Naumann
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.