Literature DB >> 17573873

Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K.

D A Buckley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The seventh amendment of the European Union (EU) Cosmetics Directive (March 2005) and the Detergents Regulations of the EU (October 2005) are now legal requirements in Europe. Cosmetic products and detergents must be labelled for 26 individual named fragrances, when present at concentrations of > 10 parts per million (p.p.m.) in leave-on products and > 100 p.p.m. in rinse-off products.
OBJECTIVES: To make an assessment of the exposure pattern to fragrance of the U.K. consumer and to determine the frequency with which the constituent fragrances of fragrance mix I (FM I) and fragrance mix II (FM II) are included in products currently sold in the U.K.
METHODS: A study of perfumed cosmetic and household products available on the shelves of U.K. retailers was carried out in January 2006. Products were included if 'parfum' or 'aroma' was listed among the ingredients. Three hundred products were surveyed and any of the 26 listed fragrances named on the label were recorded.
RESULTS: The top six most frequently labelled fragrances were linalool (190; 63%), limonene (189; 63%), citronellol (145; 48%), geraniol (126; 42%), butyl phenyl methyl propional (Lilial(trade mark)) (126; 42%) and hexyl cinnamal (125; (42%). One of these, geraniol, is present in FM I and two others, citronellol and hexyl cinnamal, in FM II, thus tested as part of the British Standard patch test series. The frequencies of other constituents of FM I were as follows: eugenol, 80 (27%); hydroxycitronellal, 52 (17%); isoeugenol, 27 (9%); cinnamic alcohol, 25 (8%); amyl cinnamal, 22 (7%); cinnamal, 17 (6%); Evernia prunastri (oak moss absolute), 13 (4%). The other constituents of FM II occurred as follows: coumarin, 90 (30%); hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral(trade mark)), 88 (29%); citral, 74 (25%); farnesol, 23 (8%). Linalool (n = 46; 66%) was the most frequently found fragrance in 70 personal care products (soap, shampoo, shower gel). Linalool (n = 47; 80%) and limonene (n = 45; 76%) were the most frequent in 59 products for men (e.g. aftershave). Limonene (n = 29; 51%) predominated in 57 household products (washing-up liquid, detergent). Limonene (n = 43; 98%) and linalool (n = 42; 95%) were the most frequent fragrances in 44 perfumes for women. Alpha-isomethyl ionone (n = 28; 72%) was the most frequent in 39 cosmetics (foundation, lipstick, etc). Citronellol predominated (n = 15; 88%) in 17 deodorants and limonene (n = 9; 64%) was the commonest in 14 dental products (toothpaste and mouthwash). Thirty-four products (11%) contained none of the listed fragrances but were labelled as containing 'parfum' or 'aroma'.
CONCLUSIONS: There is ongoing consumer exposure to the most frequent sensitizers in FM I: E. prunastri, isoeugenol and the cinnamon fragrances cinnamal and cinnamic alcohol. Hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral(trade mark)) is present at significant concentrations in almost one-third of products. Linalool and limonene, fragrance terpenes which are significant allergens in their oxidized state, are the most frequent fragrances encountered by individuals living in the U.K. The current exposure pattern of the U.K. consumer suggests that we should add oxidized limonene and oxidized linalool to the test series for patients suspected to have fragrance allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573873     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08018.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  9 in total

Review 1.  [New contact allergens for patch testing. A phase-out-model?].

Authors:  D Becker
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Isolation and screening of black fungi as degraders of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Daniela Isola; Laura Selbmann; G Sybren de Hoog; Massimiliano Fenice; Silvano Onofri; Francesc X Prenafeta-Boldú; Laura Zucconi
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  [Aspects of occupational skin diseases in hair dressers].

Authors:  R Brans; H F Merk
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Effect of linalool on the acquisition and reinstatement of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice.

Authors:  Narjes Pourtaqi; Mohsen Imenshahidi; Bibi Marjan Razavi; Hossein Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2017 May-Jun

Review 5.  Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends.

Authors:  W Uter
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

6.  Bioprofiling of Cosmetics with Focus on Streamlined Coumarin Analysis.

Authors:  Constanze Stiefel; Tina Schubert; Gertrud E Morlock
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-08-31

7.  Pigmented contact dermatitis in the axillae caused by hydroperoxides of limonene.

Authors:  Hui Li Kwong; Su Ping Regina Lim
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-19

8.  What is the added value of patch testing with 30 fragrance allergens in addition to the European Baseline series?

Authors:  Rosalie C Krijl; Norbertus A Ipenburg; Sylvie M Franken; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.419

9.  Contact sensitization to hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool: Results of consecutive patch testing and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Daan Dittmar; Marie L A Schuttelaar
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.