Literature DB >> 17573489

Single-dose montelukast or salmeterol as protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

George Philip1, David S Pearlman, César Villarán, Catherine Legrand, Tom Loeys, Ronald B Langdon, Theodore F Reiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: It has been previously established that montelukast provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after a single dose. The present objective was to assess the onset and duration of this protective action in a trial that included both positive and negative controls.
METHODS: A randomized, active-controlled and placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, three-way crossover study was conducted in 47 patients (age range, 15 to 44 years) in whom there was a 20 to 40% fall in FEV(1) following exercise (DeltaFEV(1)). In randomized sequence, patients received oral montelukast (10 mg), placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (50 microg) as a positive control. Dosing was followed by exercise challenges at 2, 8.5, and 24 h. The primary end point was maximum DeltaFEV(1) at 2 h postdose. Secondary end points included maximum DeltaFEV(1) at the two later time points, and other measures (including recovery time and need for beta-agonist rescue) at all time points.
RESULTS: The maximum DeltaFEV(1) magnitudes at 2, 8.5, and 24 h were significantly smaller after montelukast administration than after placebo administration (least squares mean [+/- SE], 13.2 +/- 1.2%, 11.7 +/- 1.2%, and 10.0 +/- 1.1% vs 21.8 +/- 1.2%, 16.8 +/- 1.3%, and 14.0 +/- 1.1%, respectively; p <or= 0.001, < 0.01, and < 0.05). All secondary end point results supported the primary end point. Montelukast and salmeterol had similar efficacy at 2 and 8.5 h, but only montelukast was effective at 24 h.
CONCLUSION: Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB having an onset within 2 h following a single oral dose and lasting for at least 24 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573489     DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of asthma in adults.

Authors:  Meyer S Balter; Alan D Bell; Alan G Kaplan; Harold Kim; R Andrew McIvor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  An update on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction with and without asthma.

Authors:  Chris Randolph
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Pediatric athletic asthmatics.

Authors:  Terrence W Carver
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children: a comparative systematic review of the available treatment options.

Authors:  Tomasz Grzelewski; Iwona Stelmach
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Exercise-induced asthma: critical analysis of the protective role of montelukast.

Authors:  Terrence W Carver
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2009-10-22

6.  Pharmacotherapy of patients with mild persistent asthma: strategies and unresolved issues.

Authors:  Paolo Montuschi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Role of Leukotrienes and Leukotriene Modifiers in Asthma.

Authors:  Paolo Montuschi
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-02

8.  Efficacy of add-on montelukast in nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis: the additive effect on airway inflammation, cough and life quality.

Authors:  Wuping Bao; Ping Liu; Zhongmin Qiu; Li Yu; Jingqing Hang; Xiaohua Gao; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Section 2. Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm: Albuterol versus Montelukast: Highlights of the Asthma Summit 2009: Beyond the Guidelines.

Authors:  Gene Colice; William J Calhoun
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.084

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.