Roxanna L Gapstur1. 1. Methodist Hospital, Park Nicollet Health Services, St. Louis Park, MN, USA. roxanna.gapstur@parknicollet.com
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To analyze the concept of symptom burden and discuss implications for symptom research and symptom management. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and published literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through Rodgers's evolutionary method of concept analysis, attributes of symptom burden were identified as dynamic, multidimensional, quantifiable, subjective, and physiologic. The major antecedent was multiple symptoms related to worsening disease status. Consequences of symptom burden included decreased survival, poor prognosis, delay or termination of treatment, increased hospitalizations and medical costs, decreased functional status, and lowered self-reported quality of life. Symptom burden is defined as the subjective, quantifiable prevalence, frequency, and severity of symptoms placing a physiologic burden on patients and producing multiple negative, physical, and emotional patient responses. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom burden is an important concept in the symptoms experience, separate from symptom distress and other related terms. The continued differentiation of symptom concepts is important for sound methodologic research and meaningful interventions that affect and improve patient experiences. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clarifying multiple symptom concepts in the symptoms experience, determining appropriate measurement methodologies for the concepts, and identifying appropriate strategies will lessen the burden of symptoms and contribute to improved quality of life and better patient outcomes.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To analyze the concept of symptom burden and discuss implications for symptom research and symptom management. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and published literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through Rodgers's evolutionary method of concept analysis, attributes of symptom burden were identified as dynamic, multidimensional, quantifiable, subjective, and physiologic. The major antecedent was multiple symptoms related to worsening disease status. Consequences of symptom burden included decreased survival, poor prognosis, delay or termination of treatment, increased hospitalizations and medical costs, decreased functional status, and lowered self-reported quality of life. Symptom burden is defined as the subjective, quantifiable prevalence, frequency, and severity of symptoms placing a physiologic burden on patients and producing multiple negative, physical, and emotional patient responses. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom burden is an important concept in the symptoms experience, separate from symptom distress and other related terms. The continued differentiation of symptom concepts is important for sound methodologic research and meaningful interventions that affect and improve patient experiences. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clarifying multiple symptom concepts in the symptoms experience, determining appropriate measurement methodologies for the concepts, and identifying appropriate strategies will lessen the burden of symptoms and contribute to improved quality of life and better patient outcomes.
Authors: David H Henry; Hema N Viswanathan; Eric P Elkin; Shana Traina; Shawn Wade; David Cella Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Adem Sav; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Elizabeth Kendall; Sara S McMillan; Fiona Kelly; Beth Hunter; Amanda J Wheeler Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Skye T Dong; Phyllis N Butow; Allison Tong; Meera Agar; Frances Boyle; Benjamin C Forster; Martin Stockler; Melanie R Lovell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joan N Chukwurah; Joachim Voss; Susan R Mazanec; Ann Avery; Allison Webel Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2020 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Stephanie Gilbertson-White; Bradley E Aouizerat; Thierry Jahan; Steven M Paul; Claudia West; Karen Schumacher; Marylin J Dodd; Michael Rabow; Ahmad H Abu Raddaha; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 2.947