Literature DB >> 17572699

Region-dependent attenuation of mu opioid receptor-mediated G-protein activation in mouse CNS as a function of morphine tolerance.

L J Sim-Selley1, K L Scoggins, M P Cassidy, L A Smith, W L Dewey, F L Smith, D E Selley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Chronic morphine administration produces tolerance in vivo and attenuation of mu opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated G-protein activation measured in vitro, but the relationship between these adaptations is not clear. The present study examined MOR-mediated G-protein activation in the CNS of mice with different levels of morphine tolerance. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Mice were implanted with morphine pellets, with or without supplemental morphine injections, to induce differing levels of tolerance as determined by a range of MOR-mediated behaviours. MOR function was measured using agonist-stimulated [(35)S]guanylyl-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) and receptor binding throughout the CNS. KEY
RESULTS: Morphine pellet implantation produced 6-12-fold tolerance in antinociceptive assays, hypothermia and Straub tail, as measured by the ratio of morphine ED(50) values between morphine-treated and control groups. Pellet implantation plus supplemental injections produced 25-50-fold tolerance in these tests. In morphine pellet-implanted mice, MOR-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was significantly reduced only in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and spinal cord dorsal horn in tissue sections from morphine pellet-implanted mice. In contrast, MOR-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was significantly decreased in most regions examined in morphine pellet+morphine injected mice, including nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen, periaqueductal gray, parabrachial nucleus, NTS and spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Tolerance and the regional pattern of apparent MOR desensitization were influenced positively by the level of morphine exposure. These results indicate that desensitization of MOR-mediated G-protein activity is more regionally widespread upon induction of high levels of tolerance, suggesting that this response contributes more to high than low levels of tolerance to CNS-mediated effects of morphine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572699      PMCID: PMC2189837          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  48 in total

1.  Relationship of brain morphine levels to analgesic activity in acutely treated mice and rats and in pellet implanted mice.

Authors:  G A Patrick; W L Dewey; T C Spaulding; L S Harris
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Quantification of the analgesic activity of narcotic antagonists by a modified hot-plate procedure.

Authors:  J P O'Callaghan; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  The expression of a high level of morphine antinociceptive tolerance in mice involves both PKC and PKA.

Authors:  Forrest L Smith; Ruby R Javed; Mark J Elzey; William L Dewey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Brainstem control of spinal pain-transmission neurons.

Authors:  H L Fields; A I Basbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 19.318

5.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Simultaneous quantitative assessment of morphine tolerance and physical dependence.

Authors:  E L Way; H H Loh; F H Shen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Subject-regulated dosing alters morphine self-administration behavior and morphine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding.

Authors:  P J Kruzich; A C H Chen; E M Unterwald; M J Kreek
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Peripheral morphine analgesia: synergy with central sites and a target of morphine tolerance.

Authors:  Y A Kolesnikov; S Jain; R Wilson; G W Pasternak
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  Antinociceptive and nociceptive actions of opioids.

Authors:  Michael H Ossipov; Josephine Lai; Tamara King; Todd W Vanderah; T Philip Malan; Victor J Hruby; Frank Porreca
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2004-10

10.  Mu-opioid receptor desensitization in mature rat neurons: lack of interaction between DAMGO and morphine.

Authors:  Christopher P Bailey; Daniel Couch; Elizabeth Johnson; Katie Griffiths; Eamonn Kelly; Graeme Henderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  Opioid tolerance development: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective.

Authors:  Emily O Dumas; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Agonist-dependent attenuation of mu-opioid receptor-mediated G-protein activation in the dorsal root ganglia of neuropathic rats.

Authors:  Ilona Obara; Ozge Gunduz Cinar; Katarzyna Starowicz; Sandor Benyhe; Anna Borsodi; Barbara Przewlocka
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Functional selectivity at the μ-opioid receptor: implications for understanding opioid analgesia and tolerance.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; Cullen L Schmid; Chad E Groer; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Alternatively spliced mu opioid receptor C termini impact the diverse actions of morphine.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Zhigang Lu; Ankita Narayan; Valerie P Le Rouzic; Mingming Xu; Amanda Hunkele; Taylor G Brown; William F Hoefer; Grace C Rossi; Richard C Rice; Arlene Martínez-Rivera; Anjali M Rajadhyaksha; Luca Cartegni; Daniel L Bassoni; Gavril W Pasternak; Ying-Xian Pan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  A "tail" of opioid receptor variants.

Authors:  Stephanie Puig; Howard B Gutstein
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Characterization of 6α- and 6β-N-heterocyclic substituted naltrexamine derivatives as novel leads to development of mu opioid receptor selective antagonists.

Authors:  Yunyun Yuan; Guo Li; Hengjun He; David L Stevens; Patrick Kozak; Krista L Scoggins; Pallabi Mitra; Phillip M Gerk; Dana E Selley; William L Dewey; Yan Zhang
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.418

7.  A novel knock-in mouse reveals mechanistically distinct forms of morphine tolerance.

Authors:  Johan Enquist; Joseph A Kim; Selena Bartlett; Madeline Ferwerda; Jennifer L Whistler
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 8.  Inflammatory mediators of opioid tolerance: Implications for dependency and addiction.

Authors:  Lori N Eidson; Anne Z Murphy
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  In vitro and in vivo functional profile characterization of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-(isoquinoline-3-carboxamido)morphinan (NAQ) as a low efficacy mu opioid receptor modulator.

Authors:  Samuel Obeng; Yunyun Yuan; Abdulmajeed Jali; Dana E Selley; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 10.  Alterations in the levels of heterotrimeric G protein subunits induced by psychostimulants, opiates, barbiturates, and ethanol: Implications for drug dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal.

Authors:  Nobue Kitanaka; Junichi Kitanaka; F Scott Hall; Tomohiro Tatsuta; Yoshio Morita; Motohiko Takemura; Xiao-Bing Wang; George R Uhl
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.