Literature DB >> 17572650

How good is to switch between biologics? A systematic review of the literature.

Loreto Carmona1, Ana Ortiz, Miguel Angel Abad.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite the biological rationale for switching between TNF-antagonists, there is not a definitive answer from a clinical point of view.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review. The strategy for the literature search included synonyms for the active drugs, trade names, and different synonyms for biologic therapies, plus the words "switch" or "switching", limited to studies in humans. The time limit was March 1st 2007. From 256 initial hits in Medline and Embase, plus 13 abstracts from rheumatology meetings, we finally included 33 studies. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The most frequently died switches are those between etanercept and infliximab. The mean number of patients studied per type of switch was 126. There are, apart from retrospective observational studies and cases series, 5 prospective cohorts from biologic registries, 1 randomised open-label clinical trial and 1 phase IV clinical trial, all seven of which are of moderate to good quality. There results are promising but not excellent. Any switch, especially those between monoclonal antibodies, have an effect size that is usually lower than that of a first biologic. When the switch is due to an adverse event with the first TNF-antagonist, however, the response rate of the second one is high. Perhaps the best alternative when a first TNF-antagonist fails is to start a different type of biologic, and leave the switch to another TNF-antagonist in the case of adverse event to the previous one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Reumatol Port        ISSN: 0303-464X            Impact factor:   1.290


  4 in total

1.  Observational study of switching anti-TNF agents in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Guenther Haberhauer; Christoph Strehblow; Peter Fasching
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05

2.  Evaluating the efficacy of sequential biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

Authors:  Regina Rendas-Baum; Gene V Wallenstein; Tamas Koncz; Mark Kosinski; Min Yang; John Bradley; Samuel H Zwillich
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.156

3.  Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis on biologic therapies in Taiwan: A 1-year mirror-image study using a national claims database.

Authors:  Kuan-Chen Chen; Chu-Hua Wu; Chao-Hsiun Tang; Kuo-Cherh Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for inflammatory arthritis in Korea: results of a Korean Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Park; Hyungjin Kim; Seung Min Jung; Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Han Joo Baek; Jisoo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.884

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.