Literature DB >> 17572614

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: a pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation.

Duncan J Critchley1, Julie Ratcliffe, Sandra Noonan, Roger H Jones, Michael V Hurley.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial with economic analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three kinds of physiotherapy commonly used to reduce disability in chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physiotherapy reduces disability in chronic back pain, but there are several forms of physiotherapy and it is unclear which is most effective or cost effective.
METHODS: A total of 212 patients referred to physiotherapy with chronic low back pain were randomized to receive usual outpatient physiotherapy, spinal stabilization classes, or physiotherapist-led pain management classes. Primary outcome was Roland Disability Questionnaire score 18 months from baseline; secondary measures were pain, health-related quality of life, and time off work. Healthcare costs associated with low back pain and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were also measured. RESULTS.: A total of 71 participants were assigned to usual outpatient physiotherapy, 72 to spinal stabilization, and 69 to physiotherapist-led pain management. A total of 160 (75%) provided follow-up data at 18 months, showing similar improvements with all interventions: mean (95% confidence intervals) Roland Disability Questionnaire score improved from 11.1 (9.6-12.6) to 6.9 (5.3-8.4) with usual outpatient physiotherapy, 12.8 (11.4-14.2) to 6.8 (4.9-8.6) with spinal stabilization, and 11.5 (9.8-13.1) to 6.5 (4.5-8.6) following pain management classes. Pain, quality of life, and time off work also improved within all groups with no between-group differences. Mean (SD) healthcare costs and QALY gain were pound474 (840) and 0.99 (0.27) for individual physiotherapy, pound379 (1040) and 0.90 (0.37) for spinal stabilization, and pound165 (202) and 1.00 (0.28) for pain management.
CONCLUSIONS: For chronic low back pain, all three physiotherapy regimens improved disability and other relevant health outcomes, regardless of their content. Physiotherapist-led pain management classes offer a cost-effective alternative to usual outpatient physiotherapy and are associated with less healthcare use. A more widespread adoption of physiotherapist-led pain management could result in considerable cost savings for healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572614     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dc26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  39 in total

Review 1.  Value-based care in the management of spinal disorders: a systematic review of cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Santoshi S Indrakanti; Michael H Weber; Steven K Takemoto; Serena S Hu; David Polly; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief mindfulness-based intervention for those with persistent pain.

Authors:  Ana Howarth; Muhammad Riaz; Linda Perkins-Porras; Jared G Smith; Jeevakan Subramaniam; Claire Copland; Mike Hurley; Iain Beith; Michael Ussher
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-04-22

3.  Outcomes of a group education/exercise intervention in a population of patients with non-specific low back pain: a 3-year review.

Authors:  S Murphy; C Blake; C K Power; B M Fullen
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  A national survey of pain clinics within the United Kingdom and Ireland focusing on the multidisciplinary team and the incorporation of the extended nursing role.

Authors:  Pungavi Kailainathan; Stephen Humble; Helen Dawson; Fiona Cameron; Shyam Gokani; Gursimren Lidder
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2017-08-18

Review 5.  Motor control exercise for acute non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Luciana G Macedo; Bruno T Saragiotto; Tiê P Yamato; Leonardo O P Costa; Luciola C Menezes Costa; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 6.  The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark S Jarrett; Joseph F Orlando; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  An educational approach based on a non-injury model compared with individual symptom-based physical training in chronic LBP. A pragmatic, randomised trial with a one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pia H Sorensen; Tom Bendix; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Dorte Lemvigh; Aage Indahl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Marienke van Middelkoop; Sidney M Rubinstein; Ton Kuijpers; Arianne P Verhagen; Raymond Ostelo; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain.

Authors:  Bruno T Saragiotto; Christopher G Maher; Tiê P Yamato; Leonardo O P Costa; Luciola C Menezes Costa; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Luciana G Macedo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-08

10.  The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada.

Authors:  Francois Dionne; Craig Mitton; Tanya Macdonald; Carol Miller; Michael Brennan
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.