Literature DB >> 17572279

Morphological variations of scar-related and spontaneous endometriosis of the skin and superficial soft tissue: a study of 71 cases with emphasis on atypical features and types of müllerian differentiations.

Dmitry V Kazakov1, Ondrej Ondic, Michal Zamecnik, Ksenia V Shelekhova, Petr Mukensnabl, Ondrej Hes, Vladimir Dvorak, Michal Michal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seventy-one cases of scar-related and spontaneous endometriosis of the skin and superficial soft tissue were studied, with a focus on atypical features and types of müllerian differentiation. All patients were women, whose ages ranged from 22 to 65 years (median, 32 years).
METHODS: Histological, immunohistochemical, and electronmicroscopic studies were performed. Clinical information was ascertained via a questionnaire solicited by the referring physicians.
RESULTS: All types of metaplastic changes of müllerian epithelium were found, including tubal (61%), oxyphilic (15%), hobnail (10%), mucinous (4%), and papillary syncytial (3%) metaplasia. Atypical features included reactive atypia (23%) and atypical mitoses in glandular epithelium (6%). Stromal changes included smooth muscle metaplasia (31%), decidualization (<1%), stromal endometriosis (<1%), and elastosis (<1%). Other features recognized included lipoblast-like cells (15%), some with intranuclear inclusions; atypical/degenerative myocytes (10%); spiral arteries (4%); and perineurial invasion (<1%). CD56 staining identified large granular lymphocytes in 15 of 20 studied specimens. Ultrastructurally, these cells showed cytoplasmic granules, some with a delimiting membrane. LIMITATIONS: This study utilizes tissue specimens that mainly were received as consultations; therefore some inherent selection bias exists. Specimens were randomly selected for CD56 immunostaining, leading also to potential sampling error.
CONCLUSIONS: All types of müllerian metaplasia can be encountered in cutaneous endometriosis. In addition, so-called atypical features described in endometriosis affecting other anatomic sites may be seen in the skin. Some features may represent a diagnostic pitfall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572279     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  3 in total

1.  Skin endometriosis: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andreea-Mariana Matei; Ana-Maria Draghici-Ionescu; Mirela Cioplea; Sabina Andrada Zurac; Daniel Boda; Ioana Serban; Constantin Caruntu; Mihaela Adriana Ilie; Gyula László Fekete
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Endometriosis still a challenge.

Authors:  C Mehedintu; M N Plotogea; S Ionescu; M Antonovici
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-09-25

3.  Cytopathological features of scar endometriosis mimicking an adenocarcinoma: A diagnostic pitfall.

Authors:  Bharat Rekhi; Pawan Sugoor; Asawari Patil; T S Shylasree; Rajendra Kerkar; Amita Maheshwari
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.