Giora Katz1, Ricardo Rodriguez. 1. Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lake City, Florida, USA. glkatz@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), continence, and sexual function after curative therapy (CT) and watchful waiting (WW) for prostate cancer. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire of HRQOL and continence was administered to patients with prostate cancer who were candidates for CT and WW. The questionnaire was re-administered during follow-up. The pretreatment and posttreatment HRQOL burden scores were compared and correlated with the treatment, continence, and sexual function. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 41 chose CT (26 chose prostatectomy and 15 radiotherapy). The average follow-up for the CT patients was 24.3 +/- 13.3 months. The pretreatment incontinence score was 0.38 +/- 0.9 and the HRQOL burden score was 16.3 +/- 8.8 (CT versus WW, P = 0.55). On follow-up, 23 (56%) of 41 CT patients were continent. The HRQOL burden score after treatment was similar between the CT and WW patients (20.4 +/- 9.6 versus 18.4 +/- 9.0, P = 0.45). The continent patients had a significantly lower HRQOL burden compared with the post-CT incontinent patients (17.41 +/- 7.4 versus 24.2 +/- 10.8, P = 0.02). The HRQOL burden score after treatment for CT patients who maintained sexual activity and CT patients who lost their sexual activity was similar (P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The HRQOL after CT of prostate cancer was related to patients' self-perception of continence. Incontinence, either urinary or fecal, was associated with an increased self-reported HRQOL burden, although reduced sexual function was not associated with such a change. The WW patients maintain their HRQOL. Separating the continent and incontinent patients during the analysis of the posttreatment HRQOL brought to light the adverse outcomes associated with post-CT incontinence.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), continence, and sexual function after curative therapy (CT) and watchful waiting (WW) for prostate cancer. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire of HRQOL and continence was administered to patients with prostate cancer who were candidates for CT and WW. The questionnaire was re-administered during follow-up. The pretreatment and posttreatment HRQOL burden scores were compared and correlated with the treatment, continence, and sexual function. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 41 chose CT (26 chose prostatectomy and 15 radiotherapy). The average follow-up for the CT patients was 24.3 +/- 13.3 months. The pretreatment incontinence score was 0.38 +/- 0.9 and the HRQOL burden score was 16.3 +/- 8.8 (CT versus WW, P = 0.55). On follow-up, 23 (56%) of 41 CT patients were continent. The HRQOL burden score after treatment was similar between the CT and WW patients (20.4 +/- 9.6 versus 18.4 +/- 9.0, P = 0.45). The continent patients had a significantly lower HRQOL burden compared with the post-CT incontinentpatients (17.41 +/- 7.4 versus 24.2 +/- 10.8, P = 0.02). The HRQOL burden score after treatment for CT patients who maintained sexual activity and CT patients who lost their sexual activity was similar (P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The HRQOL after CT of prostate cancer was related to patients' self-perception of continence. Incontinence, either urinary or fecal, was associated with an increased self-reported HRQOL burden, although reduced sexual function was not associated with such a change. The WW patients maintain their HRQOL. Separating the continent and incontinentpatients during the analysis of the posttreatment HRQOL brought to light the adverse outcomes associated with post-CT incontinence.
Authors: Julie L Kasperzyk; William V Shappley; Stacey A Kenfield; Lorelei A Mucci; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Martin G Sanda Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Anne P Cameron; Anne M Suskind; Charlene Neer; Hero Hussain; Jeffrey Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; John O DeLancey Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Peter A Elliott; Stephanie Hsiang; Ramkishen Narayanan; James Bierylo; Shu-Ching Chang; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Timothy G Wilson Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2021-01-11
Authors: N Pervez; A V Krauze; D Yee; M Parliament; A Mihai; S Ghosh; K Joseph; A Murtha; J Amanie; M Kamal; R Pearcey Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Anne M Suskind; John O L DeLancey; Hero K Hussain; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; Anne P Cameron Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Claire Kim; Frances C Wright; Nicole J Look Hong; Gary Groot; Lucy Helyer; Pamela Meiers; May Lynn Quan; Robin Urquhart; Rebecca Warburton; Anna R Gagliardi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240