Literature DB >> 17572124

Optimal estimation of the diffusion coefficient from non-averaged and averaged noisy magnitude data.

Anders Kristoffersen1.   

Abstract

The magnitude operation changes the signal distribution in MRI images from Gaussian to Rician. This introduces a bias that must be taken into account when estimating the apparent diffusion coefficient. Several estimators are known in the literature. In the present paper, two novel schemes are proposed. Both are based on simple least squares fitting of the measured signal, either to the median (MD) or to the maximum probability (MP) value of the Probability Density Function (PDF). Fitting to the mean (MN) or a high signal-to-noise ratio approximation to the mean (HS) is also possible. Special attention is paid to the case of averaged magnitude images. The PDF, which cannot be expressed in closed form, is analyzed numerically. A scheme for performing maximum likelihood (ML) estimation from averaged magnitude images is proposed. The performance of several estimators is evaluated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. We focus on typical clinical situations, where the number of acquisitions is limited. For non-averaged data the optimal choice is found to be MP or HS, whereas uncorrected schemes and the power image (PI) method should be avoided. For averaged data MD and ML perform equally well, whereas uncorrected schemes and HS are inadequate. MD provides easier implementation and higher computational efficiency than ML. Unbiased estimation of the diffusion coefficient allows high resolution diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and may therefore help solving the problem of crossing fibers encountered in white matter tractography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572124     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  14 in total

1.  Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Yonggang Lu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Yousef Mazaheri; Hilda E Stambuk; Jason A Koutcher; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Assessment of renal fibrosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: study with murine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Osamu Togao; Shigehiro Doi; Makoto Kuro-o; Takao Masaki; Noriaki Yorioka; Masaya Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reduced field-of-view and multi-shot DWI acquisition techniques: Prospective evaluation of image quality and distortion reduction in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Edward M Lawrence; Yuxin Zhang; Jitka Starekova; Zihan Wang; Ali Pirasteh; Shane A Wells; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.130

4.  Optimal decay rate constant estimates from phased array data utilizing joint Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  James D Quirk; Alexander L Sukstanskii; G Larry Bretthorst; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Comparing primary tumors and metastatic nodes in head and neck cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Yonggang Lu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Hilda E Stambuk; Gaorav Gupta; Nancy Lee; Mithat Gonen; Andre Moreira; Yousef Mazaheri; Snehal G Patel; Joseph O Deasy; Jatin P Shah; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  A maximum-likelihood method to estimate a single ADC value of lesions using diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Abhinav K Jha; Jeffrey J Rodríguez; Alison T Stopeck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phase-aligned multiple spin-echo averaging: a simple way to improve signal-to-noise ratio of in vivo mouse spinal cord diffusion tensor image.

Authors:  Tsang-Wei Tu; Matthew D Budde; Mingqiang Xie; Ying-Jr Chen; Qing Wang; James D Quirk; Sheng-Kwei Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Regression Models for Identifying Noise Sources in Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Hongtu Zhu; Yimei Li; Joseph G Ibrahim; Xiaoyan Shi; Hongyu An; Yashen Chen; Wei Gao; Weili Lin; Daniel B Rowe; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  A Maximum-Likelihood Approach for ADC Estimation of Lesions in Visceral Organs.

Authors:  Abhinav K Jha; Jeffrey J Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc IEEE Southwest Symp Image Anal Interpret       Date:  2012

10.  Dual-phase cardiac diffusion tensor imaging with strain correction.

Authors:  Christian T Stoeck; Aleksandra Kalinowska; Constantin von Deuster; Jack Harmer; Rachel W Chan; Markus Niemann; Robert Manka; David Atkinson; David E Sosnovik; Choukri Mekkaoui; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.