Literature DB >> 17571912

Nuclear stress testing in elderly patients: a review of its use in the assessment of cardiac risk, particularly in patients undergoing preoperative risk assessment.

Amgad N Makaryus1, Joseph A Diamond.   

Abstract

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) plays an important role in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients of all age groups who are undergoing assessment prior to non-cardiac surgery. MPI may utilise exercise treadmill or pharmacological stress testing. While MPI has been evaluated in a wide variety of patient subpopulations, there are very limited data on its prognostic value in the elderly population, particularly those >75 years of age, who are making up an ever increasing proportion of the patient population. Because of the higher prevalence and greater severity of CAD in older patients, the sensitivity of noninvasive MPI increases with age, whereas specificity tends to decline. In addition, maximal aerobic exercise capacity tends to decrease with age, making it common practice for elderly patients being assessed for CAD to undergo pharmacological MPI to evaluate their cardiovascular risk. In this article, we review the literature with respect to cardiac risk estimation in elderly patients undergoing MPI, particularly with respect to making prognostic assessments prior to undergoing surgery. Current data allow for the proper application of stress MPI in the elderly population. Use of MPI facilitates identification of the severity and extent of ischaemia as well as left ventricular dilatation and systolic function in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571912     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200724060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  45 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2006 guideline update on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: focused update on perioperative beta-blocker therapy: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Joshua A Beckman; Kenneth A Brown; Hugh Calkins; Elliott Chaikof; Kirsten E Fleischmann; William K Freeman; James B Froehlich; Edward K Kasper; Judy R Kersten; Barbara Riegel; John F Robb; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarian population.

Authors:  Nili Zafrir; Israel Mats; Alejandro Solodky; Tuvia Ben-Gal; Jaqueline Sulkes; Alexander Battler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of myocardial ischemia (angina) in the elderly patient.

Authors:  D D Tresch; H R Alla
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

4.  Safety and diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole-thallium imaging in the elderly.

Authors:  J Y Lam; B R Chaitman; M Glaenzer; S Byers; J Fite; Y Shah; H Goodgold; L Samuels
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in the elderly: a review.

Authors:  Olivier De Winter; Nico Van de Veire; Filip Gemmel; Ingeborg Goethals; Johan De Sutter
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 7.  Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  M L Geleijnse; A Elhendy; P M Fioretti; J R Roelandt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prognostic impact of hemodynamic response to adenosine in patients older than age 55 years undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion study.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; Chee Keong Ng; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prognostic value of stress testing in patients over 75 years of age with chronic angina.

Authors:  Raban V Jeger; Michael J Zellweger; Christoph Kaiser; Leticia Grize; Stefan Osswald; Peter T Buser; Matthias E Pfisterer
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Mark; L Shaw; F E Harrell; M A Hlatky; K L Lee; J R Bengtson; C B McCants; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Orazio Schillaci; Natale di Belardino; Francesco Versaci; Alessandro Nudi; Annamaria Pinto; Giandomenico Neri; Enrica Procaccini; Giacomo Frati; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Stable ischemic heart disease in the older adults.

Authors:  Xuming Dai; Jan Busby-Whitehead; Daniel E Forman; Karen P Alexander
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.