Literature DB >> 17571255

Reduced reciprocal inhibition is seen only in spastic limbs in patients with neurolathyrism.

C Crone1, N T Petersen, S Gimenéz-Roldán, B Lungholt, K Nyborg, J B Nielsen.   

Abstract

If reduced reciprocal inhibition plays a causal role in the pathophysiology of spasticity as has been suggested in several studies, the inhibition is expected to be impaired in spastic, but not in normal muscles. Patients with neurolathyrism offer a possibility of testing this prediction since the spastic symptoms in these patients are restricted to the lower extremities only. Three patients with neurolathyrism were tested. Their data were compared with 15 age-matched healthy subjects. All patients showed signs of spasticity in the legs. Two patients had normal voluntary muscle force in the lower extremities and one had decreased force. No clinical abnormalities were found in the upper extremities. Reciprocal inhibition between ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles was absent in all patients, whereas the inhibition between wrist extensor and flexor muscles was present and of normal size and latency. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that reduced reciprocal inhibition plays a causal role in the pathophysiology of spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571255     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0993-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Reciprocal inhibition between forearm muscles in spastic hemiplegia.

Authors:  J Artieda; P Quesada; J A Obeso
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  H-reflex recovery curve and reciprocal inhibition of H-reflex of the upper limbs in patients with spasticity secondary to stroke.

Authors:  M Panizza; P Balbi; G Russo; J Nilsson
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Patients with the major and minor form of hyperekplexia differ with regards to disynaptic reciprocal inhibition between ankle flexor and extensor muscles.

Authors:  C Crone; J Nielsen; N Petersen; M A Tijssen; J G van Dijk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition in spastic hemiplegia of man.

Authors:  N Yanagisawa; R Tanaka; Z Ito
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Reciprocal inhibition and corticospinal transmission in the arm and leg in patients with autosomal dominant pure spastic paraparesis (ADPSP).

Authors:  C Crone; N T Petersen; J E Nielsen; N L Hansen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition in patients with asymmetric spinal spasticity.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Okuma; Yoshikuni Mizuno; Robert G Lee
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C Crone; L L Johnsen; F Biering-Sørensen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Evaluation of reciprocal inhibition of the soleus H-reflex during tonic plantar flexion in man.

Authors:  N Petersen; H Morita; J Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Spinal excitation and inhibition decrease as humans age.

Authors:  Aiko Kido; Naofumi Tanaka; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Central control of reciprocal inhibition during fictive dorsiflexion in man.

Authors:  J Nielsen; C Crone; T Sinkjaer; E Toft; H Hultborn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Development and aging of human spinal cord circuitries.

Authors:  Svend Sparre Geertsen; Maria Willerslev-Olsen; Jakob Lorentzen; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Down-regulation of the potassium-chloride cotransporter KCC2 contributes to spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pascale Boulenguez; Sylvie Liabeuf; Rémi Bos; Hélène Bras; Céline Jean-Xavier; Cécile Brocard; Aurélie Stil; Pascal Darbon; Daniel Cattaert; Eric Delpire; Martin Marsala; Laurent Vinay
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Upper Limbs Muscle Co-contraction Changes Correlated With the Impairment of the Corticospinal Tract in Stroke Survivors: Preliminary Evidence From Electromyography and Motor-Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Wenfei Sheng; Shijue Li; Jiangli Zhao; Yujia Wang; Zichong Luo; Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Minghui Ding; Chuhuai Wang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 4.  The animal model of spinal cord injury as an experimental pain model.

Authors:  Aya Nakae; Kunihiro Nakai; Kenji Yano; Ko Hosokawa; Masahiko Shibata; Takashi Mashimo
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-07

5.  Spasticity mechanisms - for the clinician.

Authors:  Angshuman Mukherjee; Ambar Chakravarty
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Muscle Tone Physiology and Abnormalities.

Authors:  Jacky Ganguly; Dinkar Kulshreshtha; Mohammed Almotiri; Mandar Jog
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Recruitment gain of spinal motor neuron pools in cat and human.

Authors:  J B Nielsen; H Morita; R Wenzelburger; G Deuschl; J-P Gossard; H Hultborn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Involuntary Neuromuscular Coupling between the Thumb and Finger of Stroke Survivors during Dynamic Movement.

Authors:  Christopher L Jones; Derek G Kamper
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.