Literature DB >> 17571079

Clonal relationships between epidermotropic metastatic melanomas and their primary lesions: a loss of heterozygosity and X-chromosome inactivation-based analysis.

Soon Bahrami1, Liang Cheng, Mingsheng Wang, Timothy D Jones, Janine C Malone, Steven D Billings.   

Abstract

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has previously been demonstrated at multiple chromosome microsatellites in primary and metastatic melanomas. Epidermotropic metastases of melanoma are unique in their varied histopathologic appearance, which can mimic a primary lesion. Our objective was to compare LOH profiles in primary and epidermotropic metastatic melanoma to delineate their clonal relationship. We examined the pattern of allelic loss in the primary melanomas of nine patients in addition to the 21 corresponding epidermotropic metastatic melanomas (average 2.3 metastases per patient). DNA samples were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections using laser capture microdissection. Eight DNA microsatellite markers on six different chromosomes were analyzed: D1S214 (1p), D6S305 (6q), D9S171 (9p), D9S157 (9p), IFNA (9p), D10S212 (10q), D11S258 (11q), D18S70 (18q). In addition, X-chromosome inactivation analysis was performed in tumors from four women. LOH was seen in 67% (6/9) of primary melanomas and 81% (17/21) of epidermotropic metastatic melanomas. The most frequent allelic losses in informative cases occurred at 10q (33%), 9p (22%), and 11q (22%) in primary melanomas, and at 10q (50%), 1p (44%), and 6q (39%) in epidermotropic metastatic melanomas. Primary lesions demonstrating LOH had concordant allelic loss in at least one locus in a corresponding epidermotropic metastatic melanoma in 83% (5/6) of cases. X-chromosome analysis showed nonrandom inactivation in 75% (3/4) and 71% (5/7) of primary melanoma and epidermotropic metastatic melanoma cases, respectively. Our LOH and X-chromosome inactivation analysis data suggest that epidermotropically metastatic melanomas are clonally related to their primary lesion in many cases. Our data also indicated that some cases diagnosed as epidermotropic metastatic melanoma might be divergent clones or new primaries rather than metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571079     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  5 in total

1.  Biological resonance for cancer metastasis, a new hypothesis based on comparisons between primary cancers and metastases.

Authors:  Dongwei Gao; Sha Li
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2013-11-10

2.  Epidermotropic metastatic melanoma with perilesional depigmentation in an Indian male.

Authors:  Bhavana Doshi; Sunanda Mahajan; Uday S Khopkar; Vidya Kharkar; Prachi Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 3.  Testing clonality of three and more tumors using their loss of heterozygosity profiles.

Authors:  Irina Ostrovnaya
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-13

4.  AIM1 and LINE-1 epigenetic aberrations in tumor and serum relate to melanoma progression and disease outcome.

Authors:  Sojun Hoshimoto; Christine T Kuo; Kelly K Chong; Teh-Ling Takeshima; Yoshiki Takei; Michelle W Li; Sharon K Huang; Myung-Shin Sim; Donald L Morton; Dave S B Hoon
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 5.  Intratumor and Intertumor Heterogeneity in Melanoma.

Authors:  Tomasz M Grzywa; Wiktor Paskal; Paweł K Włodarski
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.