Literature DB >> 17570431

New insights into the pathogenesis of penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and the role of postoperative sexual function.

Paolo Gontero1, Mario Galzerano, Riccardo Bartoletti, Corrado Magnani, Alessandro Tizzani, Bruno Frea, Nicola Mondaini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed penile changes after radical prostatectomy by performing serial penile measurements. The potential effect of nerve sparing surgery and the recovery of erectile function on the degree of penile shortening were also evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 consecutive patients were enrolled. Penile measurements were taken immediately before surgery, at catheter removal, and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Sexual function was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function.
RESULTS: The maximum degree of shortening was noted at the time of catheter removal (mean 0.84 cm, CI 0.62-1.06, p <0.0001 for stretched penis). All penile parameters showed a lesser but significant decrease at all subsequent intervals. Univariate analysis revealed that baseline penile length was the only variable significantly associated with stretched penile length at catheter removal. Age, nerve sparing surgery and the recovery of erectile function were strong predictors of penile size 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that nerve sparing surgery (<0.0001) and the recovery of erectile function (p = 0.053) were independent predictors of the final changes in penile size.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile shortening after radical prostatectomy peaks at the time of catheter removal and it continues to a lesser but still significant degree for at least 1 year. Nerve sparing surgery and recovery of erectile function appeared to have an independent protective effect on penile length loss at 1 year. These figures should be taken in consideration when counseling patients for radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17570431     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Penile rehabilitation following treatment for prostate cancer: an analysis of the current state of the art.

Authors:  Tariq Al Shaiji; Trustin Domes; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comparative analysis of penile implants in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction versus postradical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R Cocera; J Torremade; J F Suarez; J Fernandez-Concha; F Vigues
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Phalloplasty and penile implant surgery.

Authors:  Jorge R Caso; Michael D Myers; Lucas Wiegand; Alejandro Rodriguez; Shan Hann; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and Peyronie's surgery.

Authors:  Jonas S Benson; Michael R Abern; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serkan Deveci; Geoffrey T Gotto; Byron Alex; Keith O'Brien; John P Mulhall
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length.

Authors:  E C Osterberg; A Maganty; R Ramasamy; J F Eid
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Increasing size with penile implants.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague; Kenneth W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Penile change following radical prostatectomy: size, smooth muscle atrophy, and curve.

Authors:  Andrew McCullough
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Neglected side effects to curative prostate cancer treatments.

Authors:  Alexander B Nolsøe; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter B Østergren; Mikkel Fode
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.