BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool in hypertensive patients. This study reports the clinical characteristics of 31,530 patients included in the Spanish Registry of ABPM. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total number of 767 investigators recruited patients with suspected or confirmed hypertension to whom an ABPM was indicated with a validated device and included them in the study. Mean blood pressures from daytime, nighttime, and the whole 24-hour period were all measured. Circadian patterns were defined depending on nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall: extreme dipper (> 20%), dipper (10%-20%), non-dipper (< 10%) and riser (nocturnal blood pressure increase). RESULTS: 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime blood pressure values were lower than those obtained at the office. Twenty percent of patients exhibited elevated office blood pressure with normal values on ABPM (<<white coat>> hypertensives or false resistant) whereas 9% showed increased values on ABPM, but normal at the office (masked hypertension). The non-dipper or riser circadian patterns were present in more than half of the patients (40.2% and 13.4%, respectively) and were associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one third of hypertensive patients exhibit blood pressure values that are not concordant between office and ABPM. More than a half of patients, especially those at higher risk, present a circadian pattern with an inadequate nocturnal blood pressure fall.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool in hypertensivepatients. This study reports the clinical characteristics of 31,530 patients included in the Spanish Registry of ABPM. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total number of 767 investigators recruited patients with suspected or confirmed hypertension to whom an ABPM was indicated with a validated device and included them in the study. Mean blood pressures from daytime, nighttime, and the whole 24-hour period were all measured. Circadian patterns were defined depending on nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall: extreme dipper (> 20%), dipper (10%-20%), non-dipper (< 10%) and riser (nocturnal blood pressure increase). RESULTS: 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime blood pressure values were lower than those obtained at the office. Twenty percent of patients exhibited elevated office blood pressure with normal values on ABPM (<<white coat>> hypertensives or false resistant) whereas 9% showed increased values on ABPM, but normal at the office (masked hypertension). The non-dipper or riser circadian patterns were present in more than half of the patients (40.2% and 13.4%, respectively) and were associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one third of hypertensivepatients exhibit blood pressure values that are not concordant between office and ABPM. More than a half of patients, especially those at higher risk, present a circadian pattern with an inadequate nocturnal blood pressure fall.
Authors: Paulo A Lotufo; Alexandre C Pereira; Paulo S Vasconcellos; Itamar S Santos; Jose Geraldo Mill; Isabela M Bensenor Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Ma Victoria Ruíz-Arzalluz; Ma Cruz Gómez Fernández; Natalia Burgos-Alonso; Ernest Vinyoles; Ricardo San Vicente Blanco; Gonzalo Grandes Journal: Trials Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 2.279