BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Management of acute symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion remains controversial. We evaluated outcome predictors of a good recovery in patients with acute symptomatic ICA occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 33 consecutive patients (men/women, 23/10; mean age, 66 years) with: 1) acute symptomatic ICA occlusion within 6 hours of symptom onset or with mismatch of symptoms and an early infarct area, 2) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 6 or more, and 3) attempted endovascular revascularization of the occluded ICA. Various single and multiple variable analyses were conducted to assess the association of 14 predictors with short-term (1-month NIHSS) and long-term (1-year modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) outcomes. RESULTS: Successful recanalization (at or more than grade 2 distal residual occlusion) was obtained in 14 (42%) of 33 and good recovery (mRS <or=2) after 1 year in 11 (33%) of 33. Distal residual occlusion (DRO; P=.005), initial NIHSS score (P=.023), and postprocedural thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (P=.027), retrograde ICA filling (P=.036), and ophthalmic collaterals (P=.046) were significant predictors of short-term outcome. DRO (P=.018) and initial NIHSS (P=.033) were significant predictors of long-term outcome on univariable analysis. DRO was the only significant predictor for short-term (P=.026) and long-term outcome (P=.033) on multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Active revascularization of acute symptomatic ICA occlusion resulted in good recovery in one third of patients after 1 year. DRO is an independent predictor of a favorable clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Management of acute symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion remains controversial. We evaluated outcome predictors of a good recovery in patients with acute symptomatic ICA occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 33 consecutive patients (men/women, 23/10; mean age, 66 years) with: 1) acute symptomatic ICA occlusion within 6 hours of symptom onset or with mismatch of symptoms and an early infarct area, 2) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 6 or more, and 3) attempted endovascular revascularization of the occluded ICA. Various single and multiple variable analyses were conducted to assess the association of 14 predictors with short-term (1-month NIHSS) and long-term (1-year modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) outcomes. RESULTS: Successful recanalization (at or more than grade 2 distal residual occlusion) was obtained in 14 (42%) of 33 and good recovery (mRS <or=2) after 1 year in 11 (33%) of 33. Distal residual occlusion (DRO; P=.005), initial NIHSS score (P=.023), and postprocedural thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (P=.027), retrograde ICA filling (P=.036), and ophthalmic collaterals (P=.046) were significant predictors of short-term outcome. DRO (P=.018) and initial NIHSS (P=.033) were significant predictors of long-term outcome on univariable analysis. DRO was the only significant predictor for short-term (P=.026) and long-term outcome (P=.033) on multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Active revascularization of acute symptomatic ICA occlusion resulted in good recovery in one third of patients after 1 year. DRO is an independent predictor of a favorable clinical outcome.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: H P Adams; B H Bendixen; E Leira; K C Chang; P H Davis; R F Woolson; W R Clarke; M D Hansen Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-07-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: B S Choi; J W Park; J E Shin; P-H Lü; J K Kim; S J Kim; D H Lee; J S Kim; H J Kim; D C Suh Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: G Marnat; I Mourand; O Eker; P Machi; C Arquizan; C Riquelme; X Ayrignac; A Bonafé; V Costalat Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J H Kwak; L Zhao; J K Kim; S Park; D-G Lee; J H Shim; D H Lee; J S Kim; D C Suh Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 3.825