AIMS: External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 +/- 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402-392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517-496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4-11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION:ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 +/- 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402-392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517-496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4-11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.
Authors: J Lüker; A Sultan; T Plenge; J van den Bruck; C-H Heeger; S Meyer; K Mischke; R R Tilz; D Vollmann; G Nölker; B Schäffer; S Willems; D Steven Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-11-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Jakob Lüker; Georg von Bodman; Arian Sultan; Jürgen Brömsen; Ruken Ö Akbulak; Benjamin Schäffer; Doreen Schreiber; Boris A Hoffmann; Michael Block; Stephan Willems; Daniel Steven Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Hamza Sunman; Kudret Aytemir; Hikmet Yorgun; Uğur Canpolat; Muhammet Ulvi Yalçin; Naresh Maharjan; Serkan Asil; Levent Şahiner; Barış Kaya; Necla Özer; Ali Oto Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Giuseppe Boriani; Irina Savelieva; Gheorghe-Andrei Dan; Jean Claude Deharo; Charles Ferro; Carsten W Israel; Deirdre A Lane; Gaetano La Manna; Joseph Morton; Angel Moya Mitjans; Marc A Vos; Mintu P Turakhia; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Europace Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826