Literature DB >> 17568442

Middle phalanx skeletal morphology in the hand: can it predict flexor tendon size and attachments?

Mary W Marzke1, Marvin M Shrewsbury, Kristin E Horner.   

Abstract

Specific sites on the palmar diaphysis of the manual middle phalanges provide attachment for the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon. It has been assumed in the literature that lateral palmar fossae on these bones reflect locations for these attachments and offer evidence for relative size of the flexor tendon. This assumption has led to predictions about relative FDS muscle force potential from sizes of fossae on fossil hominin middle phalanges. Inferences about locomotor capabilities of fossil hominins in turn have been drawn from the predicted force potential of the flexor muscle. The study reported here provides a critical first step in evaluating hypotheses about behavioral implications of middle phalangeal morphology in fossil hominins, by testing the hypothesis that the lateral fossae reflect the size of the FDS tendon and the location of the terminal FDS tendon attachments on the middle phalanx. The middle phalangeal region was dissected in 43 individuals from 16 primate genera, including humans. Qualitative observations were made of tendon attachment locations relative to the lateral fossae. Length measurements of the fossae were tested as predictors of FDS tendon cross-sectional area and of FDS attachment tendon lengths. Our results lead to the conclusion that the hypothesis must be rejected, and that future attention should focus on functional implications of the palmar median bar associated with the lateral fossae. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17568442     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  6 in total

Review 1.  The evolutionary history of the hominin hand since the last common ancestor of Pan and Homo.

Authors:  Matthew W Tocheri; Caley M Orr; Marc C Jacofsky; Mary W Marzke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Locomotor activity influences muscle architecture and bone growth but not muscle attachment site morphology.

Authors:  Karyne N Rabey; David J Green; Andrea B Taylor; David R Begun; Brian G Richmond; Shannon C McFarlin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 3.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Elevated activity levels do not influence extrinsic fiber attachment morphology on the surface of muscle-attachment sites.

Authors:  Cassandra M Turcotte; David J Green; Kornelius Kupczik; Shannon McFarlin; Ellen Schulz-Kornas
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The hand of Homo naledi.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Andrew S Deane; Matthew W Tocheri; Caley M Orr; Peter Schmid; John Hawks; Lee R Berger; Steven E Churchill
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Morphology of muscle attachment sites in the modern human hand does not reflect muscle architecture.

Authors:  E M Williams-Hatala; K G Hatala; S Hiles; K N Rabey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.